A Tyranny of True Believers
There is an interesting development taking place in the United States; voluntary segregation. Not of races, but of income and, more importantly, liberals on the one hand, and conservatives on the other. Those who share the same views and the same values are clustering together.
Although this development is logical – after all, people enjoy communicating with those who agree with their own views – it is nonetheless potentially dangerous. When people cluster together, if people only communicate with others who share the same values and views, they will become increasingly more extreme and less tolerant towards those who disagree.
Liberals will become more liberal and more dismissive of conservatives and vice versa. The result will undoubtedly be that the culture war will increase in passion and severity.
This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.
Comments are closed.
PoliGazette Comments Policy
PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree.
Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate
these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors.
Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue
publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.
(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly
or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that
respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should
not be posted.
(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.
(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional
reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.
(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not
include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement
the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.
(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements.
Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or
that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat
slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.
Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors
by email only.
"Those who share the same views and the same values are clustering together."
But hasn’t this always been the case everywhere?
I mean, it’s pretty unlikely you’re hanging out in the coffeehouses and sharing a joint with socialists and atheists.
Well, Tom, most of my friends are liberals, most of my family are conservatives, and my colleagues are a surprisingly mixed bag (for academia). So perhaps exceptions are possible in daily life.
But as I write today in a different post, the blogosphere has uniquely powerful tools for requiring and enforcing separatism and repetition of ideological scripts. The “tyranny of linking” makes it so that anyone who dissents from mandatory ideological scripts (100% controlled by extremists) gets selected out and quickly made invisible.
I don’t know if this is limited to certain parts of the country, but I still notice a healthy mix around here. And I’m in one of the bluest states in the nation.
As is happening now indeed.