Iranian Women: What About Us?
Iranian women are rightfully complaining (Dutch) that the West only talks about their country’s nuclear program, and not about women’s rights. These rights, and the horrific treatment of women in Iran, are ignored. This while the West likes to pretend that it cares deeply about human rights.
These women want the West to stop focusing completely on the nuclear program and, instead, to pay time and attention to women’s and human in general rights. Shirin Ebadi, who won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2003, is one of the Iranian women who call on the West to change its focus. She believes, like others, that pressure from the West could very well result in women gaining more freedoms in Iran; relatively at least.
The reason that the West does not talk about this subject is much is simple; how Iranians treat them women does not have any immediate impact on us, or so we believe. Nuclear weapons endanger us. But the treatment of women? Not so much.
Not directly that is. Western governments would be wise to keep in mind that women raise children. Children who are raised by unhappy and uneducated mothers are unlikely to be happy and educated themselves. Keeping women in check, so to speak, results in more anger among the population at large and, perhaps, in more extremism.
This is something we should take into consideration. In a globalizing world, we are all connected with one another.
This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.
Comments are closed.
PoliGazette Comments Policy
PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree.
Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate
these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors.
Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue
publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.
(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly
or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that
respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should
not be posted.
(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.
(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional
reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.
(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not
include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement
the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.
(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements.
Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or
that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat
slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.
Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors
by email only.
