Rice: Russia Must withdraw from Georgia

August 15th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

US Secretary of State Condi Rice told Russia that it has to withdraw immediately from Georgia at the same day that Georgia and Russia signed a cease-fire agreement.

Although Rice’s visit to Georgia and Bush’s strong words – condemning Russia for ‘intimidation and bullying’ – are good signs, the crux of the issue is whether or not the United States is willing to protect former Soviet Republics by force. At this moment, most people believe it is not.

This means that Russia will dominate the region more than it has done since the fall of the Soviet Union. Other countries in the region are looking at the United States. Officials here in Azerbaijan are happy with American support for Georgia, but complain that the initial reaction was too weak. They are clearly afraid of Russia and looking at the US for protection. When they are let down, they may very well decide that they have to be dependent on other countries. That would mean that the US would lose even more influence.

And that is something it cannot afford. Neither can Europe.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.