China Confiscates Bibles of American Christians

August 18th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

Americans in China are experiencing something most of them probably never experienced before; they are fighting to keep their Bibles in their possession. The Chinese government has, under cover of the OGs in Bejing, started a major crackdown on dissent. Along with Chinese activists Christians, even foreign ones, seem to be one of the major victims of the crackdown’s major victims.

A group of American Christians had 300 Bibles with them when they arrived in Bejing. Instead of understanding that acting against these Christians would become a major issue in the West when China could and should use the Olympics to improve its image, Chinese officials confiscated every single one of them. Members of the group now refuse to leave the southwestern city of Kunming until they get their Bibles back.

One of them, Pat Klein, said:  “I heard that there’s freedom of religion in China, so why is there a problem for us to bring Bibles?” said Klein, whose Sheridan, Wyoming-based group distributes Bibles and Christian teaching materials around the world.

The Bibles were printed in Chinese. The attempt was and still is, obviously, to spread Christianity in China; a country in which religion is oppressed because the authoritarian – I do not agree with the word ‘communist’ to describe China’s leaders – fears that religion will cause dissent and, thus, decrease their power.

That does not mean that printing Bibles is outlawed in China. No; there is one printing house allowed to print Chinese Bibles. This printing house is backed by the communist party. Bibles can be bought in some bookstores. That sounds like freedom, doesn’t it?

Well, no. Spreading the Christian faith, or any other faith for that matter, is made impossible. The government allows just enough freedom to pretend that people are free to worship as they see fit. On closer investigation, however, it quickly becomes clear that reality is quite different.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Michael Merritt
    August 19th, 2008 at 00:57
    Reply | Quote | #1

    Something makes me wonder if the Chinese thought there was anti-government things written in there.  I doubt that, but I could see this being why they confiscated them.  I think the bibles should be given back.

    I do not agree with the word ‘communist’ to describe China’s leaders

    Indeed.  China hasn’t been a purely communist nation in years.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.