Oil Prices Drop

August 18th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

The prices of oil rose in recent days, but are now falling once again (as they did before last weekend). The reason is that the threat posed by storms is easing.

To oil installations in the Gulf of Mexico, that is. Florida is still very much in trouble; Tropical Storm Faye is ‘whirling towards’ this state. 

What is most interesting about the fluctuations in the price of oil is that many thought it would continue to rise for quite a while, possibly a year or more. Experts were talking about $200, instead of $100 a barrel.

At this moment, however, one barrel of oil is $113. That is much, sure, but lower than expected and much, much lower than $200. That number, which sounded quite reasonable only a few weeks ago, now sounds completely ludicrous.

That does not mean that experts have no idea what they are talking about; more than anything else it is a sign of a changing world economy. In the changing world economy things happen rapidly. Prices are determined by the market, thus by companies and individuals. Additionally, when a certain product rises significantly in price, the market will try to come up with an alternative. As a result it will correct itself.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Steve Jones
    August 19th, 2008 at 21:10
    Reply | Quote | #1

    The evidence is clear. The truth is that the speculators or excessive speculation is causing the drop. The speculator are not stupid and  know that congress is working very hard to eliminate the London loophole and excessive speculation. Indeed it is the primary thing on congress plate.  So the evidence is clear with the investor/ speculator pulls there money out of crude oil even among the Georgia crisis. They know know whats just around the corner for them!

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.