Obama’s Lost Half Brother Lives in a Shanty Town in Kenya
Senator Barack Obama’s half brother, George Hussein Onyango Obama, has only met his brother twice in his life; when he was five years old and back in 2005, when Barack visited Kenya, the country where his father came from.
During Barack’s visit George only had a few minutes to talk to his older brother. After the short conversation both went their separate ways.*
For Barack that meant back to Washington D.C. where he would quickly become one of the most promising politicians. He was already thinking of running for president, and only a few years later he would indeed announce he’d run. He would go on to win the nomination of the Democratic Party and, by doing so, he would write history. For the first time in American history, a black man secured the nomination for one of the country’s major parties.
George’s story is slightly different; he went back to his home. A little hut in a shanty town in Kenya. His life was pretty hopeless and still is. Instead of bragging about his heritage and family connections George denied his relationship with Barack. He was ashamed of his own life and, yes, himself. His older brother; one of the most successful people in America, he a loser.
The story of George and Barack is utterly amazing. It shows were ambition and talent, combined with opportunites can bring one. It also shows how someone who does not have the same opportunities and who cannot count on the help of relatives with more money and power (certainly not all Obamas, either in Africa or the U.S., are poor), and who makes bad choices throughout his life, can live a life void of any meaning and struggle from day to day. This while both men came partially at least out of the same nest.
*If George is indeed Barack’s brother, that is.
This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.
Comments are closed.
PoliGazette Comments Policy
PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree.
Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate
these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors.
Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue
publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.
(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly
or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that
respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should
not be posted.
(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.
(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional
reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.
(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not
include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement
the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.
(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements.
Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or
that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat
slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.
Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors
by email only.
I am not sure that this story proves the saying of ‘hard work pays off’. I myself have always argued against this motto that America sells as its claim to fame around the world. I know many single moms for example, who work three labour-intensive jobs who work much harder than some of my government administrative colleagues, but they are not paid according to ‘hard work’. And then these moms come home to not sleep, but take care of their kids and work at home for no money. Thus, I think there is more to the story than the mere issue of working hard.
In the case of the Obama brothers, we are not clear on the family history (nor should we need to know) that led to the two half-brothers having very different upbringings and lives. I know from my own relatives overseas, that opportunities in many places around the world are quite different than the opportunities US citizens or first-world country nationality holders have. Furthermore, the definition of ‘hard work’ is culturally-dependent and based on your community, ethnicity or country of origin, your priorities around work or the ‘work/life/community balance’ (a concept just now taking off in America) could be very different. For example, you may prioritize your relationship with your family, even a half-sibling, if your values and norms socially trained you that the good of the family is more important than the success of one person. I am not in anyway criticizing Obama’s relationship….it is what it is and we are not clear on the family dynamics. However, I do not think that we have enough information to make a conclusion that Obama’s half-brother in Kenya feels or perceives himself as a ‘loser’. Is that term even used in Kenya and in the way that is used in North America? Perhaps his opportunities were different. Perhaps he works harder than many of us who sit at a desk all day in an airconditioned and secure building. Perhaps he did not have role models. Perhaps his life goals and values were different than our norms dictate here in North America. Perhaps he may be poor, but may be very happy and content with the life he has…which again we still do not know much about.
Tahemi, you contradict yourself. The points you make at the end of your comment prove the point that opportunities are much better in the US than in many other places in the world like Kenya. And as for your initial statement that the American dream isn’t all it’s cracked up to be, with struggling single mothers as the example- in those cases, the blame lies squarely with the fathers who aren’t supporting their children, not with our system.
No I do not contradict myself. The dynamic of opportunities in the US vs ’other’ countries is an issue within the realm of international politics and international economical structures. This has nothing to do with an individual working hard or not. You can work hard, but if there are not opportunities available to you, and further if there isn’t a national or international economic structure to support opportunities for you, then it does not matter whether you work hard or not. There is an assumption that because one is not successful in the American definition, then one is lazy or not a hard worker…which is what I am arguing against here. For example, Blacks in the US do not enjoy the same ‘privileges’ as white US citizens. This is not because they work any less, but due to institutionalized racism, issues of historical oppression, on-going issues of poverty and marginalization and so on. Thus, we need to realize how our social locations have actually helped us get to where we are….moreso than our inidividual efforts of ‘working hard’.
My last point was really that beyond North America, we as North Americans need to realize that we have various kinds of privileges around the world and globally. This is not privilege that we have earned and it is not because we are some how any better than others around the world. Ask youself, why certain countries are poor and others are not? Is it that the people in the poor countries are just stupid? Is it that they just did not care to better themselves? Is it that North America and Europe are just somehow inherently superior? The answer to all of these questions is NO! The story is much bigger than just you and I as individuals and I encourage readers to think more critically about our widely-held assumptions.
Thank you.