Convention Night

August 29th, 2008 By: Michael Merritt | Tags:

Ads like these are why I remain an undecided voter in this election:

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Lynne
    August 29th, 2008 at 17:21
    Reply | Quote | #1

    I have heard that the Obama campaign has said they will respond with an ad of their own on the evening of McCain’s acceptance speech.  Wouldn’t it be nice if this started a tradition of exchanging gracious ads on the night of all presidential nominations from now on?
    The thought kind of brings tears to my eyes.  After all the speeches and ink spent on ‘taking the high road’ in politics, maybe this could be a nice first step.
    I thought is was a gracious, classy gesture and I hope the responding ad is just as honorable.

  2. Jason, Managing Editor
    August 29th, 2008 at 17:41
    Reply | Quote | #2

    That would be nice, but I seriously doubt that the rage-fueled partisan hacks on both sides would ever allow such gestures to remain prominent for long.  For an excellent example of what I am talking about, check out Mullen’s column today over at the hilariously mis-named "Moderate" Voice.

  3. Kevin H
    August 29th, 2008 at 19:08
    Reply | Quote | #3

    Its my understanding that the congratulatory statement on nomination night is a common theme for basically all presidential elections. Not that the history makes McCain’s statement insincere, just nothing special in my mind.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.