McCain/Obama: Palin Family Off Limits
Barack Obama, speaking to reporters today, strongly emphasized that Sarah Palin’s family is off limits in this election season.
“Let me be as clear as possible,” Obama said. “I think people’s families are off-limits, and people’s children are especially off-limits. This shouldn’t be part of our politics. It has no relevance to Gov. Palin’s performance as governor or her potential performance as a vice president.”
John McCain also has made a statement regarding the Palin family:
“This is a very personal matter for the family. We should all respect the love they have for the child and the desire all parents would have for their children’s privacy.”
“The media should respect Bristol’s privacy. That’s always been the tradition and practice when it comes to the children of candidates.”
Couldn’t agree more. I would remind liberals out there who are citing “hypocrisy” that the Republicans haven’t even gone near the subject of Obama’s family.
Matter’s such as Bristol Palin’s pregnancy are private matters. It should be left alone. If you want to make an argument on abstinence-only education, there are so many other arguments that can be made without being specific to that family.
This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.
Comments are closed.
PoliGazette Comments Policy
PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree.
Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate
these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors.
Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue
publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.
(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly
or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that
respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should
not be posted.
(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.
(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional
reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.
(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not
include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement
the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.
(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements.
Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or
that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat
slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.
Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors
by email only.
True, but few have as much of an impact as the hypocrisy charge inherent in the idea that a family that preaches abstinence-only education would fail to succeed within their own family. It makes a mockery of their strongly held beliefs on the subject.
And, as crude as it is, it’s an effective counter-charge to show why Palin shouldn’t be listened to regarding sexual education, if that’s what you believe.
I happen to agree with that belief and, to a large extent, consider this one of a litany of "litmus test" subjects that help reveal the fundimental thought-process of a politician.
Put it this way. If McCain dies in office (not an unlikely scenario) Palin will be in charge of the military, scientific, judicial, and public health initiatives of the federal government. Her personal opinions on subjects like "sex ed" are of concern to the public, as are her own actions when dealing with those very issues.
The woman’s being publicly vetted to take over the most powerful job in the world because it seems the McCain team didn’t do their homework ahead of time. Politics is messy and we’re foolish to expect this issue to go away any time soon.
Those who seek to claim that Bristol Palin’s pregnancy is relevant to her mother’s qualifications for office rely upon two unexamined underlying assumptions: (1) that a comprehensive sex ed program would have prevented the pregnancy; (2) that Sarah Palin’s degree of support for comprehensive sex ed is a determining factor in who, if anyone, receives it.
Since I know of no evidence that either assumption is true (let alone both), I continue to insist that bringing a 17-year-old girl into a partisan political debate is not only irrelevant and abusive, but an indicator of extremely unethical behavior on the part of those who attempt to do it. The charge of “hypocrisy” simply does not apply unless it can be shown that Sarah Palin advocated in favor of her daughter getting pregnant. Tell me, Dustin, if one of your children shoplifts from a store, does that make you a hypocrite for having a position that says stealing is wrong???
There was once a time when many Democrats condemned the demonization of teenage mothers. Apparently, that principle (along with many others they claim to hold) is out the window the very instant that an empty rhetorical partisan advantage can be gained. And I thought only the Chinese and the Klingons held the rest of the family responsible for the faults of the children…
It is difficult for me to overstate the degree of anger and contempt I have for left-leaning partisans who try to use a 17-year-old pregnant girl as a pawn in their political game-playing. Even better than Barack Obama’s acceptance speech at the convention has been his unequivocal condemnation of these rumors and tactics. I think more of his supporters should take their cue from the candidate on this one. The longer they persist with these grossly offensive lines of inquiry, the more they generate sympathy for McCain/Palin among the very same group of moderates that they need to keep on board in order to win.
I think there are fair criticisms to be made about Sarah Palin’s record. But none of those fair criticisms involve referencing her daughter in any way. If Sarah Palin’s views on sex ed are wrong, then they are wrong regardless of whether her daughter is pregnant. Maybe you should try debating them that way — on substance — instead of dragging a 17-year-old kid into it.
i dont judge her at all , but it is unreal not to comment that the lady ’s hand are full with her house responsiblity. with the little baby who need her 24 7 with his condation and her teenage kids who need her for guidance and direction . at this time i trully believe her family should come first. she need to put her house in order first then try to put the whole country in order. country can manage with other leaders but her family will need her sopport now. concerned mom
as private as they want us to believe , if the girl is a Dr somewhere we would be hearing how a good mother the senetor is. why do she want to take care of the whole world children when her own family is burning? her little one and other children need her most. what a hypocracy. she is already over burdened to be a vice president, not to mention if she is ever needed to take over or travel.
Gov. Palin has made her daughter’s pregnancy relevant to public debate for two reasons: 1) she has made ‘family values’ a central theme of her public personae; and 2) she seeks a position of incredible power and influence. McCain is wrong; Obama too. Unless Palin is willing to declare that if elected, she will not allow her own ideas about family to effect her policy positions, then we have not just a right, but a duty to inquire about into both the content and the efficacy of her views.
High-minded declarations about the sanctity of family privacy might reflect a world we all wished we lived in, but – thanks in large part to polititicians like Palin, herself – such is not the case for the world we must actually confront.
I don’t think there’s many arguments that can make me of the mind that Bristol Palin deserves this media attention just because of the political views of her mother, regardless of what hypocrisy it may show. The argument for or against abstinence-only education can be made in more general terms, and pro and con arguments. No need to pick on any person’s family to do it.
For the sake of full discosure, I’m for comprehensive sexual education.