“Exceeded expectations” is the highest praise that the media chattering classes can bestow. And that is exactly where even some of the more partisan talking heads had to go after Gov. Sarah Palin’s acceptance speech in St. Paul tonight.
Striking in the speech was Palin’s quick wit and humor. “What’s the difference between a hockey mom and a pit bull? Lipstick.” Palin went after Obama in the same happy warrior tone: “Being a small town mayor is kind of like being a community organizer, but with responsibilities.” There was no sign of the socially conservative extremism predicted by Palin’s critics.
Palin’s address was also peppered with wonkish details, giving lie to the emerging anti-Palin meme casting her as an intellectual lightweight. This meme has even extended to sexist metaphors involving cheerleaders and bikinis. Palin’s detailed expositions on energy policy and references to dependency on Iran and Saudi Arabia put that issue down the ladder of effectiveness.
In brief, Palin did what she needed and more. Those who oppose McCain-Palin on policy grounds are going to need to gear up for more substance than the trivia, nonsense, and offensive garbage they have hurled at her thus far. Palin the happy partisan pit bull is in play, and she is not backing down.
This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.
Comments are closed.
PoliGazette Comments Policy
PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree.
Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate
these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors.
Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue
publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.
(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly
or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that
respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should
not be posted.
(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.
(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional
reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.
(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not
include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement
the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.
(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements.
Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or
that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat
slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.
Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors
by email only.
MSNBC.com’s first article on Palin’s speech has a sub-header that reads:"McCain running mate speaks as someone unconcerned with public opinion"Of course, here MSNBC is confusing the press with the public, as the header above that reads this:"Palin fires back at media, ‘Washington elite’"
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26525268/
I thought she did a fine job, although I could have cared less about 4/5ths of what she mentioned about her family. (i understand why she said it all, but it’s not a point for me).
A Democrat in the room was like – oh she’s throwing too many barbs, the Democrats don’t do that. I said, with what her family is being put through – she’s owed it and far more. She didn’t think the Dem’s did any sort of mud throwing. And certainly felt like the Dem’s didn’t do anything to her family.
MSNBC’s Andrea Mitchell’s reaction was priceless. She truly looked as though she was covering a natural disaster instead of a political convention.
She read a speech off a teleprompter written by others filled with outright falsehoods and snarky culture war barbs. Yeah I am impressed. I would expect a little more actual analysis here.
Jammer,One part of the vetting process that was reported on in the news was the McCain campaign was looking back at Palin’s past speeches. One of the reason I read they chose her was because ’she could give a good speech’.We all know there are questions about her experience on things like foreign policy. But really, the idea that she’s so stupid she couldn’t write a good speech on her own is so pathetic and patronizing, given that she was able to defeat the encumbent in the Republican Primary in Alaska.From news reports she co-wrote this last speech, and in the middle of her giving it, her teleprompter broke and she had to wing it.And we can argue all we want about what was a falsehood in her speech, but what about arguing about all the falsehoods in Obama’s speech? What about questioning whether Obama can be articulate without a teleprompter?But we should be glad for all your brilliant analysis.
Did you feel the same with Bill Clinton? Reagan, Bush 1, Bush 2, HRC, McCain, Carter, Ford, Nixon, Johnson, JFK, Eisenhower……. Try to have real feelings rather than trumped up ones.