Ike: Natural Destruction

September 7th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

Hurricane Ike, by many considered to the most dangerous hurricane this year, is causing chaos, destruction, panic and fear in places it has hit, and is likely to hit. It ‘damaged most of the homes on Grand Turk island as it roared onto the Bahamas, raked Haiti’s flooded cities with driving rain and threatened the Florida Keys on its way to Cuba as a ferocious Category 4 storm Sunday.’

‘Turks and Caicos premier Michael Misick said Ike damaged 80 percent of the homes on the main island and that hundreds lost their roofs as the hurricane made a near-direct hit. People have been cowering in closets and under stairwells and “just holding on for life. They got hit really, really bad,” he told’ the AP this morning.

In the meantime, Ike was on his way to the Bahamas’ Great Inagua Island. On this island ‘85 people inside a community center shelter huddled around a radio.’

“It’s looking terrible,” said Henry Nixon, a reserve police officer. “All we can do is hunker down and pray.”

After raging over the Bahamas, Ike will head towards Cuba. This island will be hate late Monday, after which Ike will go on towards the Gulf of Mexico.

Governor Bobby Jindal of Louisiana is taking all precautions necessary before Ike hits. ‘In the Florida Keys, tourists were ordered out ahead of the storm and authorities planned a phased evacuation for residents Sunday morning, starting with the southernmost islands.’ The storm is more than destructive; it is potentially deadly.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Teresa
    September 8th, 2008 at 21:20
    Reply | Quote | #1

    God Bless These People. All are im my prayers.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.