Big Bang Machine On; Human Progress At Its Finest

September 10th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

The Large Hadron Collider, a 17-miles long underground ring, was switched on near the Franco-Swiss border earlier today. By doing the experiment, scientists hope to learn more about the creation of the universe and how it works exactly.

LHC is one of the most complicated scientific machines built in the history of mankind. Today,  it was switched on and started using high-energy to smash atoms and analyze the remains. These remains, it is believed, will reveal more secrets about the universe than humans have been able to uncover for decades, centuries even.

The experiment could tell us more about how the universe was first created ‘and whether extra dimensions exist in space.’

“We’re overwhelmingly confident we’re going to see tremendous breakthroughs in physics,” UA physics Professor John Rutherfoord said.

Scientists worked on the project for 15 years.

Although quite some individuals believe the experiment to be dangerous – it could theoretically create a minor black hole – scientists believe it to be safe.

“We wouldn’t be turning this thing on if we really thought it would destroy the world,” said Elliott Cheu, a science-team member and associate dean of UA’s College of Science.

Cheu and Rutherfoord are both working for UA, they are two of more than a dozen UA scientists working on the project in Europe.

The scope of the LHC is truly impressive: ‘In a tunnel buried 100 metres below ground, on the shores of Lake Geneva, scientists are attempting to thread a stream of sub-atomic particles around a 27km (17 mile) ring without touching the sides. When the protons snake all the way around the circle, and begin to orbit it more than 11,000 times a second, a new eye will have been cast on the nature of everything.’

‘Within a few months, the particle accelerator will start to condense its protons into beams a quarter of the diameter of a human hair, and to fling them together at 99.9999991 per cent of the speed of light. The resulting collisions will generate energy so intense that such conditions have not existed since a trillionth of a second after the big bang, throwing sub-atomic debris into vast detectors.’

These detectors, then, will ‘track and see new particles, and perhaps even new dimensions — structural components of the cosmos about which we have been able to guess, but not to know. It is fitting that they are housed in caverns so large they could hold the naves of great churches like Westminster Abbey. These are cathedrals of a different kind, which celebrate the glory of knowledge and discovery.’

The LHC experiment – and it seems to have worked out rather well, the world still exists – is a gigantic step forwards for science, and mankind. It allows us to do something considered impossible for hundreds of generations and, by so doing, it will teach more about the universe we live in. Understanding the universe, then, will help us improve our daily lives.

It is an audacious project, one of unimaginable scope. The heartbeat of all those who love science and even those who do not but who are of course pro-human advancement cannot help but go up.

The Engineer Online published an article written by someone who visited CERN, the scientific center, last year for a tour around the LHC. It is a good, impressive, read.

There were certainly questions asked following my feature. We received several letters asking what possible use clashing particles together could serve, and whether the vast sums of money and the stores of scientific expertise could be better used elsewhere. Certainly, the former chief scientific advisor to the UK government, Sir David King, thinks so: he said this week that there should be less blue skies research, but rather more concentration on ameliorating climate change and improving food production.

Which is a remarkably unimaginative attitude, to my way of thinking. What possible use could quantum mechanics and particle physics be? What have they given us so far? Nothing much. Quantum mechanics gave us electronics and microprocessors and lasers, not to mention nuclear power, for better or worse. High-energy physics has given us every single medical imaging technique. Think it’s useless? Try telling someone whose life has been saved by magnetic resonance imaging or positron emission tomography.

And that’s completely leaving aside what might be CERN’s greatest contribution to society, the World Wide Web, developed there and given away free, and without which none of you would be reading this.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Interested
    September 10th, 2008 at 10:51
    Reply | Quote | #1

    discovery for discovery’s sake.

    bravo

  2. Prabhat
    September 10th, 2008 at 13:51
    Reply | Quote | #2

    CONGRATULATIONS!!!
      GOOD GOING…. WE ARE PROUD TO HAVE SUCH SCIENTISTS WITH US…EVEN SIR ALBERT AND SIR ISSAC WOULD BE FEELING PROUD OF ALL OF YOU…SCIENCE WILL NOTE IT AS ITS GOLDEN DAY TODAY… 
    BRAVO…!!!

  3. kumar
    September 10th, 2008 at 15:45
    Reply | Quote | #3

    This is the game played by the scientist who have scientific madness

  4. Knowledge Vs Wisdom
    September 10th, 2008 at 15:48
    Reply | Quote | #4

    Simple Mathematics:

    Good Scientific Knowledge – Wisdom = Artificial Big Bang

  5. Tully
    September 10th, 2008 at 18:05
    Reply | Quote | #5

    World fails to end, details at 10….

  6. Kevin H
    September 10th, 2008 at 19:13
    Reply | Quote | #6

    Just a quibble with the times article, "The resulting collisions will generate energy so intense that such conditions have not existed since a trillionth of a second after the big bang, throwing sub-atomic debris into vast detectors"

    Not actually true, and it’s language like this that gets people scared. There are a lot of collisions with the same energy taking place today. One occurs roughly ever 1000-3000 years inside our own planet. Similar rates should have happened for all matter everywhere, with some accounting for the density of matter. That translates into "The Universe as a whole conducts more than 10 million million LHC-like experiments per second"

    My astrophysics isn’t all that great. But what I think the times is misreporting is the idea that right after the big band EVERY particle had this much energy. Quickly, most of that matter cooled down. What we call cosmic rays are actually those very small percentage of particles that didn’t loose their energy. My physics knowledge stops at this point and I’m not sure why these particles didn’t cool down… maybe they have never collided with anything yet?

    Anyways, the entire point of the LHC is not to do anything dangerous and new, but rather to reproduce a natural cosmic phenomenon at an exact location that just so happens to be right in front of the most sophisticated detectors ever created.

    Just a preemtive anti-cook strike. In general I like the post very much =)

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.