Wal-Mart Moms, Where Will They Go

September 10th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

One of the main reasons for Barack Obama’s fall in the latest polls, and John McCain’s rise is that white women are suddenly uniting behind the Republican nominee. In recent weeks, ‘McCain enjoyed a 20-percentage-point turnaround against Obama among white women, going from an 8-point deficit before the Republican National Convention to a 12-point advantage after it.’

Before the Republican National Convention, McCain was informed he had to do something to change the game. He was trailing Obama considerably among white women. ‘Pre-convention polls by Quinnipiac University, for instance, showed McCain with a huge “gender gap” in states like Ohio, Minnesota and Wisconsin, where his support among white women trailed his numbers among men by 20 percentage points, and in Colorado, where the spread was 30 points.’

These are all swing states McCain has to win in November.

Team McCain realized this, and decided something had to change. They had to do something that would change the pattern; they had to get white women on their side.

And so they chose Sarah Palin as McCain’s running mate.

Everything instantly changed. Suddenly white women had a candidate they could identify with, after Hillary Clinton. She was one of them; a mother (of five!), with her own career, trying to combine taking care of a family with earning a living.

Democratic pollster Celinda Lake calls them “Wal-Mart moms, or Wal-Mart grandmas” and says they are not so much undecided as conflicted in making their choice this year. Geoff Garin, a Democratic pollster who served as chief strategist of Hillary Clinton’s campaign in its final days, agrees. “Frankly, it’s because they are conflicted on Obama,” he says. “They’d like to vote for a Democrat, but they’re not sure Obama is the one.” The Democratic nominee has not yet made the sale with these female voters, in part because they have yet to be convinced he has the experience he needs, and also because they are more culturally conservative than he is. And there could be another factor, one that is harder for pollsters to measure. “They are more racially sensitive, honestly,” than younger and more educated women, says Lake.

With his choice of Palin, McCain “definitely caught their attention,” Lake adds. But whether this is merely a blip or a real trend has yet to be determined. Obama strategist Anita Dunn predicts there will be a “settling effect” in the polls, as the Democratic campaign brings more scrutiny to Palin’s record — drawing attention, for instance, to the fact that she once actively supported the now-infamous “bridge to nowhere” earmark that she now claims to have turned down. At a news conference Tuesday morning in Riverside, Ohio, Obama himself dismissed the latest polling numbers and predicted that women’s votes would shift again in the coming weeks, as they focus on which candidate is more likely to improve the education system, provide better health care and transform the economy. “Ultimately,” he said, “those are the issues I think that are going to make the greatest difference in this race.”

But just in case they don’t, Obama has become increasingly aggressive in challenging the GOP ticket’s efforts to co-opt his mantra of change. “You can’t just re-create yourself,” the Democratic nominee said Monday. “You can’t just reinvent yourself. The American people aren’t stupid.” But if he is going to win over the Wal-Mart moms, Obama is also going to have to make a stronger case for himself.

What goes for McCain, also goes for Obama; he too needs white women to support him. If not by large numbers, than at least enough to make the difference.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Interested
    September 10th, 2008 at 15:14
    Reply | Quote | #1

    it’s certainly an interesting dynamic – one I’ll be interested how it winds up in the end.  On one hand you have scores of women saying – what does McCain think we’ll vote for Palin because she’s a woman – that’s insulting.

    Yet it’s the very reason HRC got any resemblance of a chance in the race to begin with.

    Interesting to say the least.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.