Rare Honesty

September 11th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

The Moderate Voice’s Pete Abel published a post critical of Governor Sarah Palin on Tuesday. He called it “A Conservative’s Four Point Case Against Sarah Palin.”

Within no time, however, readers made clear to him that one of the points was wrong. Being the honest and polite person he is – he really is, no sarcasm used – he edited his post immediately after realizing he treated Alaska’s governor unfairly. The fourth point was retracted, the title of the post changed into “A Conservative’s Three Point Case Against Sarah Palin.”

The debate about his post continued unabated, however. Readers also debated the three other points, accusing him of treating Palin unfairly.

Again being the honest man he is, Pete then published a post the following day explaining he can no longer stand by his original ‘anti-Palin’ post. In it he admitted something a lesser person would never admit. “In the end, though I’m still not a Palin fan, I suspect my rush to judgment may have blinded me to certain nuances about her record — nuances that I’d otherwise gladly investigate and consider, if it were another candidate,” he wrote.

“It now appears that my ‘research’ on Palin was really not research at all, but a seek-and-destroy mission, seizing anything that supported my pre-determined views. Shame on me. That’s not what a so-called moderate should do.”

The post is a refreshing change in the normal tone of the debate in the ‘blogosphere.’ The blogosphere is clearly divided among partisan lines, with virtually no blogger willing to say anything even remotely positive about ‘the other side’s candidates.’ Posts are not intended to be honest, truthful and fair and balanced (no pun intended), but to discredit the other side, and to destroy people’s image.

Pete’s approach to the job, though, shows that there is certainly hope for at least some blogs, some part of the blogosphere. Perhaps dishonesty rules in 90% of it, but the other 10% makes it worthwhile to log on to the Net, and start surfing news and opinion websites and blogs (not exactly the same).

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Interested
    September 11th, 2008 at 03:03
    Reply | Quote | #1

    I wouldn’t call Pete a conservative, he certainly is moderate though – and more often than not – tries to see most sides to an issue.  Indeed something fresh in this age.

    Too bad he closed his blog to work at TMV.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.