Home Foreclosed, No Right To Vote – UPDATED with Mich. Rep. Responses

September 11th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

This post has been updated with responses from Michigan Republican Party Director of Research and Communications Bill Nowling. Mr. Knowling said the report at the Michigan Messenger is false.

Via Digg comes the following item at the Michigan Messenger: ‘The chairman of the Republican Party in Macomb County Michigan, a key swing county in a key swing state, is planning to use a list of foreclosed homes to block people from voting in the upcoming election as part of the state GOP’s effort to challenge some voters on Election Day.’

“We will have a list of foreclosed homes and will make sure people aren’t voting from those addresses,” party chairman James Carabelli told Michigan Messenger in a telephone interview earlier this week, the MM reported.

State election rules allow the state party to ‘assign “election challengers” to polls to monitor the election. In addition to observing the poll workers, these volunteers can challenge the eligibility of any voter provided they “have a good reason to believe” that the person is not eligible to vote. One allowable reason is that the person is not a “true resident of the city or township”.’

J. Gerald Hebert, a former voting rights litigator for the U.S. Justice Department who now runs the Campaign Legal Center, was asked about the report. He said that a foreclosure notice is probably not sufficient “for a challenge, because people often remain in their homes after foreclosure begins and sometimes are able to negotiate and refinance.”

According to voter challenge directives handed down by Republican Secretary of State Terri Lynn Land, voter challenges need only be “based on information obtained through a reliable source or means,” the Michigan Messenger claimed.

“But poll workers are not allowed to ask the reason” for the challenges.

Michigan Messenger went on to claim that the McCain campaign might be directly involved. ‘McCain’s regional headquarters are housed in the office building of foreclosure specialists Trott & Trott. The firm’s founder, David A. Trott, has raised between $100,000 and $250,000 for the Republican nominee,’ the Michigan Messenger claimed.

Critics have often said in other elections that one party – often enough both though – did its best to prevent a certain group of people from voting. In this particular case, the Michigan Messenger claims the targeted group are African-Americans. Although some may imply that only racism could possibly inspire actions as described by the MM, the more rational explanation is that partisans simply want their party to win elections.

UPDATE: In a response to the news as first reported by the Michigan Messenger, Michigan Republican Party Director of Research and Communications Bill Nowling told PoliGazette:

This story is not true. The Michigan Republican Party is not using foreclosure lists to challenge voters. This has never been discussed. This is not being discussed. This will not be discussed. Period.

UPDATE II: In a later e-mail Mr. Nowling added:

We take this story by the Michigan Messenger to be false. I spoke directly with the chairman of Macomb Country GOP and he says he never said anything to the Messenger as it was reported in the Messenger. The Messenger is a left-leaning blog funded by ultra-Left billionaire George Soros. It is not an independent news source.

That said, there is not now nor has there ever been any plan to use home foreclosure lists to challenge voters. Such a list would be meaningless in determining whether a voter is eligible to vote in a precinct for which they are attempting to vote.

As another note, it is the Michigan Republican Party, the state party, and not the county parties that operates voter integrity programs. County parties have no role in our Election Day Operations programs.

Edited at 6.10 PM ET; changed wording of article to make it clear that the Michigan Messenger’s report does not go undisputed. We regret the earlier wording.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Kaspar
    September 11th, 2008 at 22:45
    Reply | Quote | #1

    "Racism has nothing to do with it, the drive to win has."

    So that makes it… Ok, then? What are you saying, here?

  2. Michael van der Galien, Editor-in-Chief
    September 11th, 2008 at 23:04
    Reply | Quote | #2

    Um. I’m informing you about something, and giving you and others the room to make up your own mind. I know such an approach is rare these days.

  3. Bill Nowling
    September 11th, 2008 at 23:10
    Reply | Quote | #3

    This story is not true.  The Michigan Republican Party is not using foreclosure lists to challenge voters. This has never been discussed.  This is not being discussed. This will not be discussed. Period.

    Bill Nowling
    Director of Communication
    Michigan Republican Party

  4. Chris
    September 11th, 2008 at 23:59
    Reply | Quote | #4

    Michael;
    Do the right thing, pull the post or put the update at the top

  5. Michael van der Galien, Editor-in-Chief
    September 12th, 2008 at 00:17
    Reply | Quote | #5

    Chris; see updates. We regret the earlier wording and are happy that the Michigan Republican Party responded to the report so our readers will not be misinformed.

  6. Chris
    September 12th, 2008 at 05:22
    Reply | Quote | #6

    Thanks Michael

  7. Miles Dugo
    February 23rd, 2009 at 11:46
    Reply | Quote | #8

    As usual, every election has it’s own story. Some stories are made to make controversies. That’s why I hate politics but I have to get involve because politics really effecting our lives.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.