Bolivia: Compromise Reached

September 15th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

The Bolivian government said on Sunday that it had reached a compromise with the opposition. The opposition and supporters of the government clashed with each other for several days in the province of Pando. The fighting left 28 people dead, according to government officials.

The deal was the result of eight hour long talks in the capital, La Paz.

A state of emergency remains in the province, however. Government troops have taken over Pando’s capital Cobija.

The situation in Bolivia worried neighboring Chile. This country’s government called an emergency meeting of the Union of South American Nations earlier ‘to help promote a democratic solution to the crisis before it spreads throughout the region.’

Bolivia’s Interior Minister Alfredo Rada said the government had ordered the arrest of the region’s Governor, Leopoldo Fernandez. He is accused of hiring “Brazilian and Peruvian assassins” to carry out the “ambush” of farmers supportive of President Morales.

Bolivian ambassador to the UK, Maria Beatriz Souviron Crespo added that Mr Fernandez was “acting outside of the law.”

“He’s provoking violence in the region. We have lost many lives. And life is very precious, for this country, for this government, and for everybody,” she said.

A local farmers’ leader, Shirley Segovia, told Erbol radio that the victims “were killed like pigs, with machine guns, with rifles, with shotguns, with revolvers.”

Fernandez himself, meanwhile, denied any involvement in the violent clashes. “The government has a great ability to distort things, and its arguments are always the same – accusations without reason,” he told radio channel Radio Fides.

Details about the deal are, as of yet, unknown. The initial problem was that President Morales wanted to amend the constitution in order to distribute the country’s wealth (from gas sales) more equally among the population and to, in general, help the country’s poor indigenous population. Additionally, Morales wanted to make it possible for the government to redistribute land, meaning that those who own more lands than the government deems necessary would lose their possessions.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.