Big Bang Machine in Trouble

September 21st, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

Although the launch of the Big Bang machine, or Large Hadron Collider (LHC), was successful problems set in soon afterwards.

More than one week ago the machine, which took 20 years to build, was switched on. All appeared to go well. Beams were fired around the accelerator’s 27km (16.7 miles) underground ring. Then the idea was to collide those beams head on.
But before being able to collide anything, scientists working on the gigantic machine have to find solutions to problems that could in theory endanger the project or at least delay the next steps for weeks, possibly months.

The first test collision was scheduled before the official inauguration, October 21. It has now become clear that this is not doable. Scientists fear this second step may to be delayed until the end of the year, or even until well into 2009.

What caused the problem? Well, scientists describe it as a “massive” magnate quench. Those of us who are not science freaks will have to do with the results of this ‘quench’: temperatures in about 100 of the LHC’s super-cooled magnets soared by as much as 100 degrees Celsius.

As if that was not enough, fire brigades had to be called in because a tonne of liquid helium leaked out into the LHC tunnel.

One of the eight parts of the LHC now has to be cooled down to 1.9 Kelvin (-271C; -456F) so that scientists can repair it. 1.9 Kevlin is colder than deep space.

Luckily for those of us who feared that this would be the end for this massive project, the European Organization for Nuclear Research maintains that the recent problems should be considered minor bugs, and nothing more.

“If you keep an eye on the big picture, we’ve been building the machine for 20 years. The switch-on was always going to be a long process,” James Gillies, Cern’s director of communications said.

“A year or two down the line, this moment will be a distant memory, and we’ll be running smoothly.”

Sadly, however, this is not the first problem the LHC faced, and it won’t be the last. Then again, the scientists working on it are the best in Europe, the best in the world even. It seems unlikely that they will allow themselves to be stopped by anything.

Some of the problems encountered – flood threats for instance – and overcome were documented by the BBC.

Correction: reader Randal L. Schwartz explains that we made an error in our reporting:

“One of the eight parts of the LHC now has to be cooled down to 1.9 Kelvin (-271C; -456F) so that scientists can repair it. 1.9 Kevlin is colder than deep space.”You got that backwards. That’s the temp it normally operates at. They have to warm it up (takes weeks) before they can send people in to work on it. Then they have to cool it down again (takes weeks) to get it operating. Hence, a couple of months offline. Ooops. And, although some parts of the press are reporting this as a “quench”, where the beams hit the containment facility, there was no beam at the time. This was a mechanical failure that lead to a permanent electrical failure that requires physical access to fix.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Randal L. Schwartz
    September 21st, 2008 at 17:08
    Reply | Quote | #1

    "One of the eight parts of the LHC now has to be cooled down to 1.9 Kelvin (-271C; -456F) so that scientists can repair it. 1.9 Kevlin is colder than deep space."You got that backwards.  That’s the temp it normally operates at.  They have to warm it up (takes weeks) before they can send people in to work on it.  Then they have to cool it down again (takes weeks) to get it operating.  Hence, a couple of months offline.  Ooops.And, although some parts of the press are reporting this as a "quench", where the beams hit the containment facility, there was no beam at the time.  This was a mechanical failure that lead to a permanent electrical failure that requires physical access to fix.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.