Brown Prepares for Crucial Speech

September 23rd, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

UK Prime Minister Gordon Brown is set to give the speech of his lifetime tomorrow. During the convention of his party, Labor, Brown has to convince his party’s activists, supporters, and leaders that he is the man able to lead Labor to a victory, or at least a close call, in 2010, and to deal with the country’s economic woes in the years in between.

Sadly for Brown, however, the only people who think he’s qualified for the job are the ones who will stick by him no matter what, and who seem to be more than willing to blow their party up in order to hang on to power within their party.

The objective analyst can only comes to one conclusion; Brown is destroying Labor. Where Labor is now the biggest party in Parliament, it would only receive 24% of the votes if elections were held today. The conservative Tories, on the other hand, would receive 52%; that is nearly 30% more, and more than twice the votes that would go to Labor.

More than anything, Brown has proven to be an ineffectual, technocratic leader who may be a genius behind the scenes, but a failure in public. His speeches are not good, neither are his ideas. He’s not a man of ideas, it seems, nor of action. Voters cannot sympathize with Brown; not even his best friends and closes allies seem to like him. Where Tony Blair had charisma, Brown has … nothing really. At best: a terrible haircut.

It’s time for Brown to go. The convention will support him, still, but this convention should not be taken seriously. If Brown truly wants to help his party win elections, he’s step down now.

Since I’m a conservative, though, I don’t complain too much. The Tories will probably win in 2010, and deservedly so. They are the party of ideas nowadays.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.