Obama: Moderate or Liberal?

September 24th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

A lot has been said in recent months about Barack Obama’s ideology. Is he a moderate, or a (radical?) liberal. Or perhaps a pragmatic idealist (yes, those exist. Thomas Jefferson was one of them for instance)?

Although a lot has been said about this subject, this article at Commentary adds significantly to it nonetheless. It is well worth your time.  The author clearly shows that, Obama may not be a far-leftist now, but he certainly was quite a radical progressive only a few years ago.

He constantly joined radical progressive organizations. His friends were all radicals, and he chose them on purpose. He decided to become a community organizer because he believed in radical leftist theories of society, and he joined Trinity Church because he was attracted to the highly political nature of it and its Rev. Wright.

The article is a good read. It makes clear that Obama is trying hide a lot, and – what fascinates me – that he was quite honest about how he approaches people, how he manipulates them, in his books and other writings (see for instance his autobiography; he’s very honest about ‘change’ and stuff like that in it; in using ‘change’ in general, not defined, in order to rally people to his cause).

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Rudi666
    September 25th, 2008 at 15:44
    Reply | Quote | #1

    ROFL – I read the Commentary and I now know that Obama is a dirty smelly hippie Satanist.

    Obama left Chicago after three years to attend Harvard Law School. As he would explain, “I had things to learn . . . , things that would help me bring about real change.” After graduating with honors in 1991, he returned to the Windy City to join the small law firm of Judson Miner, an activist who had been attorney to Mayor Harold Washington. Within three years of his return, he also became deeply involved with Bill Ayers, a former leader of the so-called Weather Underground. This leftist terrorist group, akin to the German Baader-Meinhof gang or the Italian Red Brigades, specialized in bombing government buildings. Ayers later wrote boastfully that he had personally carried out an attack on the Pentagon. Ayers’s wife and closest collaborator was Bernardine Dohrn, whose views were so extreme that they seemed to cross a line from ultra-leftism to Satanism. At a meeting of the Weather Underground, she hailed the murders then recently committed by Charles Manson’s demented followers. “Dig it, first they killed those pigs, then they ate dinner in the same room with them, they even shoved a fork into a victim’s stomach!” she exulted, giving a three-fingered salute to signify a fork.

    I also now know that the lefty spectrum goes from liberal – prograssive – radical – Satanist. Are you sure this isn’t a Onion spoof?

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.