Pakistani Journalist Says US Destroyed His Life

September 24th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

Pakistani journalist Jawed Ahmad, a 22-year-old reporter who worked for Canadian TV (CTV), said on Tuesday that he planned to force the U.S. government to apologize (and pay) for detaining him for well over 11 months, and – according to him – torturing him while imprisoned.

Ahmad was arrested by American troops because they suspected him of being in the tank for the Taliban. He had, the U.S. military said, “an unlawful combatant.”

He was accused of having contact with Taliban leaders. He even had their telephone numbers and had video footage of them, the military claimed.

11 months later, Ahmad was released. His case never went to court.

“I want justice. I’ll knock the doors of (U.S.) Congress, I’ll go to (U.S. President George W.) Bush, I’ll go to (Democratic presidential hopeful) Obama, to everywhere and everyone until I get justice,” Ahmad said.

“I was tortured and jailed for 11 months and 20 days for doing nothing,” he added.

“They have destroyed my future, my soul. I’ll fight until they apologize to me and give me back what I have lost,” he said.

Ahmad claims that the U.S. tortured him; they would not have allowed him to sleep for a nine-day period, and slammed his head against the walls on several occasions. Additionally, Ahmad told reporters, they put him in a cell with mentally ill prisoners who then proceeded to beat him up whenever they could.

“I’m not a terrorist, I have never been a terrorist. I’m a journalist. With the help of other journalists and human rights (organizations), I’ll fight for my rights.”

The U.S. military responded to the accusations brought forth by Ahmad: “We don’t have any evidence of his mistreatment while in detention here,” U.S. Captain Christian Patterson said.

Quite reporters have worked with both Al Qaeda and the Taliban, leading the U.S. military and others to be extremely cautious when a specific reporters seems to be able to produce material that reflects badly on U.S. forces regularly, as seemed to be the case with Ahmad.

The habit of the United States military, meanwhile, to lock up suspects without giving them any tools to defend themselves continues to anger and frustrate the rest of the world, especially Moslem countries and Europe.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Gazza
    September 26th, 2008 at 04:29
    Reply | Quote | #1

    “We don’t have any evidence of his mistreatment while in detention here,” U.S. Captain Christian Patterson said.

    Of course they don’t.  Its been destroyed (again).

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.