On Harry Reid, Partisan Hack, and the Crisis

September 26th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

“This is a problem created by Republicans.”

- Democratic Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid earlier today.

As said earlier, I sure am happy that Democrats are not politicizing this issue. Perhaps I should add that I am glad they’re being honest.

Why do I say that? Because every single expert on the planet says that this ‘problem’ was created by both Democrats and Republicans. Lest we forget, Democrats were in charge for the last two years, and they did not do anything to stop the problem either. And if we go back to the very start of the problem, we will have to go back to around the year 2000. Lets think, who were in charge of Congress then?

Right.

He also lashed out at John McCain. Again. Saying “we don’t need presidential politics” in this debate. “Guess who came to town,” and all broke apart, Reid said.

Harry Reid proves to be one of the worst American politicians in the modern era. Of course, he already was horrible, but he is making himself look even more horrible by his partisan posture during times of crises. The man is simply not capable of finding solutions for big problems facing the States and, thus, the world.

Republicans, meanwhile, aren’t innocent either. House Republicans are obviously playing politics. They are at this moment objecting to the ‘bailout’ because they receive angry phone calls from their constituents saying they oppose the bailout. These House Republicans then publicly say that private individuals and companies can take care of the crisis; a silly statement. And they know it’s a silly statement, but they don’t care; they want to be reelected. And, in order to get reelected, they’re willing to gamble.

For those who don’t realize just how big the problem is: banks borrowed from each other. They took over loans, etc. They now refuse to lend money to other banks. This means that money is not circulating. When money is not circulating, the economy freezes. When the economy freezes, it’s in trouble. This is made even worse by the following: where the Great Depression was caused by private citizens running to banks to get their money – something banks can’t possibly allow without collapsing – it are now financial institutions who are panicking. The reason for this is that they do not know just how big the debts are and are not sure what companies will suffer most.

So financial institutions run to each other, demanding their money, while not being willing to lend money to other such institutions. The result: financial institutions will collapse. Some have collapsed, others will collapse if the government does not intervene now.

And when those companies collapse, what do you think will happen to other companies? If there’s no money to go around, they too have trouble. They can’t get money they need from their banks. The result? Chaos.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. SteveJJ
    September 26th, 2008 at 17:26
    Reply | Quote | #1

    Harry Reid is an idiot.  He needs to go back to Searchlight and keep his pie-hole shut.  

  2. C Stanley
    September 26th, 2008 at 17:31
    Reply | Quote | #2

    These House Republicans then publicly say that private individuals and companies can take care of the crisis; a silly statement.

    Who actually said that?

  3. Debate on | The Palmetto Scoop
    September 26th, 2008 at 18:48
    #3
Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.