Pakistan Warns U.S. Again, This Time After Exchanging Fire
The situation at the Pakistani – Afghan border is becoming increasingly problematic; where U.S. forces were forced to go back recently because Pakistani soldiers opened fire on them, they now decided to shoot back.
According to the U.S. military, Pakistani soldiers opened fire at two U.S. helicopters that crossed the border in order to strike against the Taliban and Al Qaeda hiding in Pakistan’s tribal region.
Pakistani soldiers then opened fire at the helicopters, the U.S. army said, after which ground forces accompanying the helis on their mission fired warning shots (in the air). Instead of backing down, Pakistani forces fired back.
The Pakistani military, meanwhile, says the exact opposite; according to them Pakistani forces fired warning shots when they saw the helicopters at which moment the helicopters started firing at the Pakistani troops. They, then, fired back.
Whatever the case, it is for the first time that the two sides have exchanged fire. This is, considering the fact that they are allies, significant. It is a sign that the situation at the border could very well escalate; unless the U.S. gives in. It is unlikely that Pakistan will give in, because it cannot do so; President Asif Ali Zardari has to present himself as a strong, determined leader, willing to say ‘no’ to the United States. If he does not, he may very well be ousted sooner rather than later.
This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.
Comments are closed.
PoliGazette Comments Policy
PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree.
Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate
these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors.
Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue
publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.
(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly
or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that
respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should
not be posted.
(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.
(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional
reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.
(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not
include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement
the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.
(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements.
Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or
that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat
slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.
Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors
by email only.
Wow..we’ve given Pakistan nearly 7 billion dollars to fight terrorism, and we’ve sold them 3.5 billion in arms. So, if we end up at war in Pakistan, we’ve already funded them and armed them with US taxpayer money (Ok..its really money borrowed from China, but we’ve taken the intest only loan..so its good..right?) . This is a completely crazy situation. If the already Anti-American Paki’s see Zardari as a US puppet, it will get very ugly, quickly. We have a powder keg of a situation here..this is serious, funny, and surreal at the same time.