That Senator John McCain enjoys to gamble every now and then is nothing new. However, how often he plays and his ties to the gambling industry were not known, until recent. The British newspaper the Daily Telegraph reports that the ties are extensive. McCain gets more money than most of his colleagues from the gambling industry. Only months ago, McCain himself and campaign manager Rick Davis were welcomed to one major casino and played for hours, the report states.
The article asks one question that needs to be asked about McCain’s gambling habit; will it put him at odds with the Evangelical base of his party?
He has had trouble with them all his life. They consider him too moderate, he considers them insane. If they find out about his passion for gambling, because it seems to be a passion alright, and his extensive ties to the gambling industry, they may very well once again realize that he is not one of them, to put it mildly.
Then again, McCain is certainly no exception. There are many men who enjoy to gamble, be it either in a casino or with friends. How many of you don’t organize poker nights with a group of friends regularly? This may even go for Evangelical Christians.
Additionally, McCain is far from the only person running for the office of president who enjoy gambling. Many other former U.S. presidents enjoyed it as well, or they had other vices. As they say, all great men have great vices. If McCain’s ‘great vice’ is gambling once per month, well, his ‘vice’ is pretty innocent.
However, the ties to the industry may hurt him. He enjoys presenting himself as a maverick, a reformer. He talks about taking on lobbyists, but his ties to the industry show that his anger towards lobbyists is limited to those who do not lobby for the gambling industry. It is undoubtedly something the Barack Obama campaign will point out and use against him.
This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.
Comments are closed.
PoliGazette Comments Policy
PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree.
Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate
these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors.
Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue
publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.
(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly
or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that
respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should
not be posted.
(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.
(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional
reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.
(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not
include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement
the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.
(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements.
Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or
that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat
slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.
Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors
by email only.
I think the perception that as a gambler, he gets a thrill out of taking risks could hurt him as well- particularly since his opponents are already playing up his bold campaign moves as ‘erratic’.
Michael, any word on the source of those funds? People like to play up the amount of money a candidate gets from a company, but more often than not, it’s from the employees of that company. A much different proposition than all of it coming from the top guns or lobbyists.