A Leadership Crisis

October 1st, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

David Gergen and I are in complete agreement: the refusal of the U.S. House of Representatives to vote for the bailout plan as proposed by Treasure Secretary Hank Paulson reflects a major leadership crisis. And it’s not merely a crisis on the side of the administration, or the legislative branch.

It is also a Congressional problem. After all, Congress’ leaders supported the plan, but their footsoldiers did not.

Gergen goes further than that though. He argues, I think he’s right, that the leadership crisis is not merely political. It is also a business problem, a media problem, an institutional problem.

Polls and other research indicate that Americans in general complain about a lack of leadership. This leadership problem (in society) is, I think, very real. What it also reflects, however, is that modern citizens are in the danger of becoming too dependent on some kind of perfect, or nearly perfect, ‘leader.’ Leaders have always had weaknesses, they have always had problems. One of the greatest ‘leaders’ in America’s history, was not able to convince 50% of the Union to support him and his cause.

One can often hear Americans in the blogosphere, media, on television, and so on, talk about how they need ‘better leaders.’ The question should be asked, however, what they expect from ‘a leader.’ What is it they think ‘leaders’ can accomplish they cannot accomplish by themselves, and what kind of leaders do they think America had in the past?

To me, the growing demand for a stronger leadership in every area of life is a troubling developing. It means citizens do not take responsibility for their own problems, and for their own choices, for their own country but, instead, let everything depend on ‘leaders’ who are automatically deemed unworthy when they don’t succeed in creating a wonderful utopian world for everyone.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. C Stanley
    October 1st, 2008 at 15:18
    Reply | Quote | #1

    Well, just take a look at how the two House leaders acted. John Boehner called the Paulson bill a "crap sandwich", and Nancy Pelosi told many of her party’s members that she did not expect them to vote for the bill.

    That’s either an unwillingness to lead people toward an unpopular solution, or it belies their true feelings that the plan was a bad one.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.