Obama’s Fundraising Success: With a Little Help from Foreigners

October 2nd, 2008 | By: Michael van der Galien

Tags:

Leave a comment

It was reported last Monday - it missed the radar thus far - that Barack Obama’s campaign received many millions of dollars from individuals who, as of yet, remain anonymous. Most of these individuals, it seems, live in foreign countries and… are unlikely to be American citizens. Rather, it seems that foreigners are contributing en masse to Obama’s campaign; especially Iranians seem more than willing to invest in Obama.

Obama’s campaign has been reluctant thus far to inform the public about who the bulk of donors are. Those who give less than $200 can remain anonymous and, sure enough, the majority of Obama’s donors give less than this amount. When asked, the McCain campaign released the files about such donors nonetheless… but Obama refused.

“Contributions that come under $200 aggregated per person are not listed,” said Bob Biersack, a spokesman for the FEC. “They don’t appear anywhere, so there’s no way of knowing who they are.”

The FEC breakdown of the Obama campaign has identified a staggering $222.7 million as coming from contributions of $200 or less. Only $39.6 million of that amount comes from donors the Obama campaign has identified.

And:

Under campaign finance laws, an individual can donate $2,300 to a candidate for federal office in both the primary and general election, for a total of $4,600. If a donor has topped the limit in the primary, the campaign can “redesignate” the contribution to the general election on its books.

In a letter dated June 25, 2008, the FEC asked the Obama campaign to verify a series of $25 donations from a contributor identified as “Will, Good” from Austin, Texas.

Mr. Good Will listed his employer as “Loving” and his profession as “You.”

A Newsmax analysis of the 1.4 million individual contributions in the latest master file for the Obama campaign discovered 1,000 separate entries for Mr. Good Will, most of them for $25.

In total, Mr. Good Will gave $17,375.

Following this and subsequent FEC requests, campaign records show that 330 contributions from Mr. Good Will were credited back to a credit card. But the most recent report, filed on Sept. 20, showed a net cumulative balance of $8,950 — still well over the $4,600 limit…

Similarly, a donor identified as “Pro, Doodad,” from “Nando, NY,” gave $19,500 in 786 separate donations, most of them for $25. For most of these donations, Mr. Doodad Pro listed his employer as “Loving” and his profession as “You,” just as Good Will had done. …

Following FEC requests, the Obama campaign began refunding money to Doodad Pro in February 2008. In all, about $8,425 was charged back to a credit card. But that still left a net total of $11,165 as of Sept. 20, way over the individual limit of $4,600.

And foreigners seem to be involved as well:

The FEC has compiled a separate database of potentially questionable overseas donations that contains more than 11,500 contributions totaling $33.8 million. More than 520 listed their “state” as “IR,” often an abbreviation for Iran. Another 63 listed it as “UK,” the United Kingdom.

More than 1,400 of the overseas entries clearly were U.S. diplomats or military personnel, who gave an APO address overseas. Their total contributions came to just $201,680.

But others came from places as far afield as Abu Dhabi, Addis Ababa, Beijing, Fallujah, Florence, Italy, and a wide selection of towns and cities in France.

Until recently, the Obama Web site allowed a contributor to select the country where he resided from the entire membership of the United Nations, including such friendly places as North Korea and the Islamic Republic of Iran…

In July and August, the head of the Nigeria’s stock market held a series of pro-Obama fundraisers in Lagos, Nigeria’s largest city. The events attracted local Nigerian business owners.

At one event, a table for eight at one fundraising dinner went for $16,800. Nigerian press reports claimed sponsors raked in an estimated $900,000…

In June, Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi gave a public speech praising Obama, claiming foreign nationals were donating to his campaign.

“All the people in the Arab and Islamic world and in Africa applauded this man,” the Libyan leader said. “They welcomed him and prayed for him and for his success, and they may have even been involved in legitimate contribution campaigns to enable him to win the American presidency…”…

A pair of Palestinian brothers named Hosam and Monir Edwan contributed more than $31,300 to the Obama campaign in October and November 2007, FEC records show.

Although Gadhafi may believe that foreign donations are ‘legitimate’ the fact of the matter is they are not; foreigners are not allowed to donate money to presidential candidates in the United States. The reason for this is, of course, that foreigners will support someone who may act in their interest, rather than in the interest of their own nation, the United States.

Most troubling about this entire affair is not that foreigners are trying to influence U.S. elections. No, what is troubling is that the Obama campaign is making it easy for them to do so and more than willing to spend the money they give.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  1. Claudia, Assistant Editor
    October 2nd, 2008 at 18:07
    Reply | Quote | #1

    I’m one of those "foreigners" that has donated to the Obama campaign. I got a call from a very nice volunteer in Chicago, who told me that they had, for some reason, some 50 THOUSAND donations that included no passport number (a must if you are donating from abroad), and could I please provide mine. I gave it, and wondered aloud why it was they did have my home phone number but not my passport number, which I had included in the online donation. She said that she didn’t quite know what happened, but that apparently the computer had "lost" a large number of passport numbers, and they literally had to call each and every person on the list to get their info. If they didn’t get it, they couldn’t accept the donation.

    It’s anecdotal, but apparently there is an issue with money coming in from abroad with no info, and also a good faith effort to corroborate the identiy of donators.

  2. Bat Masterson
    October 2nd, 2008 at 23:46
    Reply | Quote | #2

    Of course, none of this could POSSIBLY be a right-wing smear tactic, since it’s so difficult to derail a campaign will vague allegations based on data any idiot could fill into a computer form, and Republicans would never sink to such depths.

Comments are closed.