CNN: Biden Spoke at Lower Level than Palin

October 4th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

According to quite a fascinating report at CNN, Sarah Palin spoke at a higher level during Thursday’s debates between the vice presidential candidates than her Democratic counterpart Joe Biden.

Palin spoke at the level of a 10th grader, Biden at that of an 8th grader.

One of the things the expert asked by CNN noted was that Palin used the ‘passive voice’ more than Biden. The passive voice is meant to deflect responsibility. The reason for this stat – Palin used it in 8%, Biden in 5% – is that Biden constantly tried to pin the Bush’s administration’s policies and decisions on Palin. Since Palin did not have responsibility for the Bush administration, she obviously used the passive voice often.

The two candidates used roughly the same anount of words. This stands in stark contrast with the debate between the presidential candidates: McCain spoke little more than 7,000 words, Obama more than 8,000.

Some stats: Grade level: Biden, 7.8; Palin, 9.5 (Newspapers are typically written to a sixth-grade reading level.)

Sentences per paragraph: statistically tied at 2.7 for Biden and 2.6 for Palin.

Letters per word: tied at 4.4.

Ease of reading: Biden, 66.7 (with 100 being the easiest to read or hear), versus 62.4 for Palin.

During his seven debates in 1858 against incumbent Stephen A. Douglas in their race for a Senate seat from Illinois, Abraham Lincoln spoke on the level of an 11th grader.

Interesting about the stats above is that CNN points out that newspapers are indeed ‘typically written to a sixth-grade reading level.’ This should counter all those who say that politicians try to oversimplify matters. If you can accuse politicians of treating voters like little children, what about newspapers?

The research should, of course, eliminate the accusation that Palin is not intelligent enough to be vice president. She is intelligent, and she is able to express herself rather well.

One wonders whether Palin hurts herself by speaking on a 10th grade level. After all, there is a reason newspapers are written in language 6th graders can understand; the public likes it that way.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Kaspar
    October 4th, 2008 at 20:21
    Reply | Quote | #1

    "One wonders whether Palin hurts herself by speaking on a 10th grade level. After all, there is a reason newspapers are written in language 6th graders can understand; the public likes it that way."

    Now that’s just elitist (kidding).

    But isn’t it strange how some (I’m not pointing the finger at this blog) right-wing commentators are rapidly switching from saying people are just too ground-level and honest to find favors with the eloquent, global-minded and patronizing democrats to saying the people isn’t educated and knowledgeable enough to understand how important it is to rally to a strong leader? Mark Steyn does this regularly and I expect many morons like him will do the same after reading about this analysis.

  2. cs
    October 5th, 2008 at 00:24
    Reply | Quote | #2

    “But a higher grade level doesn’t mean what you’re saying is understandable. CNN brings up a Palin sentence toward the end of the debate.

    “What I would do, also, if that were ever to happen, though, is to continue the good work he is so committed to of putting government back on the side of the people and get rid of the greed and corruption on Wall Street and in Washington,” Palin said.

    The firm grades that sentence at a super doctorate level giving it an 18.3 grade.

    “When she said it, it sounded good, but on paper it’s a completely different animal,” said the President of the Global Language Monitor. “It’s like, what is that?”

    http://features.csmonitor.com/politics/2008/10/04/palin-speaks-at-higher-grade-level-than-biden/

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.