RNCC on the Attack on Freddie and Fannie

October 4th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

The Republican National Congressional Committee has decided to launch an attack on Democrats on their affiliation with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The ad is obviously aimed at Democrats and produced by a highly biased source, but it captures the pro-Fannie and Freddie policies of Democratic Congressional leaders in recent years quite well.

YouTube Preview Image

The fact of the matter is that Democrats defended Freddie and Fannie when it should have been perfectly clear on everyone that both companies would be in trouble years later. They behaved irresponsible and reckless. Those who enabled them to do so, did the same.

I especially take great pleasure at watching Franks defend both companies. Hilarious to see that the man who defended both shortly ago, was now the Democratic leader in the negotiations about the bailout bill and pretended that it was all the fault of Republicans.

Will it be effective? Probably not. Republicans have been blamed for the crisis, and to a degree rightfully. What seems to be forgotten in the debate, however, is that two sides are to blame here; both parties enabled these companies to behave recklessly, and to destroy the financial markets and thus the economy by doing so.

Since that ‘both’ part is missing from the debate about the crisis, I felt it important to post this video.

Via Instapundit.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Bal(t)imoron
    October 4th, 2008 at 15:09
    Reply | Quote | #1

    Please check that YouTube link again. I have an error message that the video is no longer available.

  2. No, it works with me just fine even. Try it again. Are you using firefox?

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.