McCain Proposes American Homeownership Resurgence Plan

October 8th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

On Wednesday, Senator John McCain, Republican nominee for president, explained a plan he announced during Tuesday’s presidential debate a bit further. The plan, he said during the debate, would aim at helping homeowners in trouble.

The Senator said today that “if elected president, I will direct my Treasury Secretary to implement an American Homeownership Resurgence Plan to keep families in their homes, avoid foreclosures, save failing neighborhoods, stabilize the housing market and attack the roots of our financial crisis.”  

3fc0ae76-aafe-4edf-9ac8-bcb77fe32d4e-small.jpg ”America’s families are bearing a heavy burden from falling housing prices, mortgage delinquencies, foreclosures, and a weak economy. It is important that those families who have worked hard enough to finance homeownership not have that dream crushed under the weight of the wrong mortgage,” McCain said in a statement.

“For those that cannot make inflated payments or their mortgage exceeds the value of their home, mortgages must be re-structured to put losses on the books and put homeowners in manageable mortgages.”

The Resurgance Plan proposed by him, McCain went on to say, “would purchase mortgages directly from homeowners and mortgage servicers, and replace them with manageable, fixed-rate mortgages that will keep families in their homes.” This will, he explained, “eliminate uncertainty over defaults, support the value of mortgage-backed derivatives and alleviate risks that are freezing financial markets.”

McCain’s announcement of the American Homeownership Resurgence Plan comes at a moment when he is trailing Obama by as much as 11% in the polls. The main reason for Obama’s big lead is that most Americans (59%) believe he is better able to deal with the economy, and has better plans to help them come through the difficult months, possibly years, ahead. McCain’s plan is clearly aimed at trying to offer Americans an alternative by showing that McCain too is willing to use the power of the government to help protect them from a collapse of the financial markets specifically, and the economy generally.

Although McCain hopes to reach out to moderate and undecided voters with his plan, he may very well alienate the conservative base of the Republican Party, however. Well read bloggers and columnists such as Michelle Malkin criticized his plan during and immediately after yesterday’s debate, indicating they do not believe that the government has the solutions for the current problems facing America. Several columnists for the conservative National Review Online, meanwhile, argued that McCain’s “big government” solutions would not help him win the elections; these columnists and pundits believe that McCain has to come up with small government solutions, not big government solutions. If people can choose between two big government solutions, these critics argue, they will vote for the person representing the “big government party.”

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Mick Davison
    October 8th, 2008 at 22:27
    Reply | Quote | #1

    What is this…Socialism???

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.