China Agrees to Land Reform Package

October 12th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

The Communist Chinese government agreed to a major land reform that it thought to shape the country’s economic policy for years to come.

Although details about the package approved by the country’s communist regime are unknown it is thought to enable farmers to transfer or rent (parts of) their land more easily.

“The Communist Party of China Central Committee on Sunday approved a decision on major issues concerning rural reform and development,” Xinhua news agency said on Saturday.

Its report added that “[t]he global credit crisis freezing up the world’s finances may be a blessing in disguise for China as it aims to modify its economic structure after three decades of breakneck growth.”

Analysts believe the package to potentially be the most important economic reform in three decades in the communist country.

When communist leader Mao came to power, he reformed the country’s economy tremendously. He started a massive revolution in every area of life. These reforms had a tremendous impact on the country. Thirty years ago, the government (after Mao’s death) broke up massive communal farms and allowed families to ‘farm their land under 30-year government contracts.’

These family owned farms, however, are small, making it hard if not impossible ‘to run the farms profitably.’

In order to make a profit ‘many farmers swap chunks of land to be held in common by the village.’ Furthermore, ‘people leaving the village to work in richer coastal areas often lease farming rights to others in informal arrangements.’

The new reform would make it easier for farmers to make a profit, which means that the growth in wealth of the county would finally reach its farmers as well. For years, only residents of the major cities profited from the nearly unlimited growth of the country’s economy. The package, however, could very well result in farmers raising their income, which would be a tremendous step forward for them.

As such, it can be said that China continues to reform its economy by giving its people more freedom. It is still run by a highly oppressive government, but citizens have gained tremendous (relatively spoken) freedoms in the last decade or so. These freedoms were mostly limited to businessmen and residents of the cities, however. It now seems that villagers too can count on more freedom in this regard.

It is a small step, compared to the West, but an important one nonetheless. The more the Chinese government will allow the people economic freedom, the more prosperous they will become. As we know, the more prosperous people become and the more economic freedoms they have, the more they demand political freedom and rights as well.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.