Mark Foley’s Replacement Caught in… Sex Scandal
In what can easily be called the most ironic news of the day, it seems that the man who replaced disgraced Republican Congressman Mark Foley has been caught up in a sex scandal of his own. Back in 2006, Tim Mahoney (Democrat), ran against Foley, running on a family values platform.
It now turns out, however, that Mahoney had an affair, and that he bribed the woman he had an affair with, Patricia Allen, and offered her a job.
The job would earn her $50,000, Allen already received $121,000.
As a ’shut up’ bonus you could say.
Mahoney denied the accusations, but there is one major problem. We’ve got a tape.
That does not exactly sound like a man who kept his zipper shut, no does it?
Some advise to Mahoney: when you run on a family values platform, keep those pants on.
This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.
Comments are closed.
PoliGazette Comments Policy
PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree.
Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate
these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors.
Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue
publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.
(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly
or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that
respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should
not be posted.
(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.
(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional
reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.
(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not
include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement
the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.
(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements.
Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or
that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat
slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.
Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors
by email only.
