Federal Court Takes on Voter Fraud in Ohio

October 15th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

Acorn continues to cause trouble for Democrats nationwide: a federal court in Ohio has now ruled that the state’s top officials should set up ‘a system by Friday to verify the eligibility of newly registered voters and make the information available to the state’s 88 county election boards.’ The ruling came in response to many complaints about voter registration fraud, committed by organizations such as Acorn.

The case was filed by Republicans, against Ohio’s Secretary of State Jennifer Bruner, a Democrat. She had refused to double check the new registration forms, which were filed en masse, many of them probably fraudulent.

‘The full 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Cincinnati on Tuesday upheld a lower court ruling’ that she ‘must use other government records to check thousands of new voters for registration fraud.’

A week ago, a three-judge panel had disagreed. The full court, however, has now overruled that decision.

There are two main problems the fake forms cause:

1. It allows non-existing individuals to vote before election day, when rules are less tight. Some people have been known to travel from state to state, so as to register and vote in several of them, and thereby distorting the election process.

2. It causes election workers to work overtime, in fact, they cannot do their job: thousands of fake registration forms all have to be reviewed by them… by hand. The fake forms cause a major problem, for it is virtually impossible for these officials to do so in time. This means that real voters suffer, for their registration form may not be approved before the deadline.

Bruner, meanwhile, has shown herself to be a particular partisan hack, as seldom seen anywhere in the country. Rather than making sure that voters, real voters, will decide these elections, she tried to enable fraudulent organizations that try to win the elections for Obama through illegal means. By doing so, she has made a charicature of democracy.

Meanwhile, the rest of the world is watching, learning and commenting: America, the self-proclaimed country of the free and of democracy, seems unable to organize elections without massive fraud.

And yes, the world does notice, and no, it does not improve America’s standing in the world, let alone it’s ‘moral leadership.’

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. C Stanley
    October 15th, 2008 at 17:14
    Reply | Quote | #1

    The overlap of registration period and early voting period is especiallly troubling IMO. Not only is it problematic to have same day registration and voting (those ballots, once cast, can’t be traced back to an individual voter, so there’s NO opportunity to weed out those that might be illegitimately cast) but then also, the Ohio Sec of State Brunner declined to put any poll watchers in place during this period. When questioned about it, her spokesperson (who was interviewed by phone by a Cleveland radio talk show host) hung up when he was challenged about this! They’re response basically was that it was the legislature’s job to put those safeguards in place and they had neglected to do so- but the interviewer repeatedly pointed out that there was NOTHING that stopped Brunner from doing it and this was part of her responsibility in overseeing the integrity of the election. The spokesperson obviously had no answer to that, and ran away from the scrutiny.

    We’d never allow people to vote on election day without polling supervisors to ensure that there wasn’t any coercion or other problems going on- and we know that ACORN canvassers who are filing all of these late registrations are directly telling people to vote for Obama, and paying people off with cigarettes or other bribes. It’s astonishing that Brunner won’t admit to the obvious problems that existed with the same day voting process.

  2. dottie moss
    October 16th, 2008 at 16:35
    Reply | Quote | #2

    You can register to vote as many times as you want, but when it comes to voting, you can only do that once, you have to have a voters registration card, has your name on it. And you have to show proof of ID before you step up to vote. This is the way WV does it, it is really simple, your name is not right with the address on your drivers license or photo ID, you dont vote.

  3. Adam Smith
    October 16th, 2008 at 18:37
    Reply | Quote | #3

    Many states here make voting so simple that anyone can vote, including the dead. Democrats fight tooth and nail the use of tamper-proof photo IDs. Now why would they not want everyone to use a valid ID to vote? The answer is self-apparent. I have a crazy idea: Let’s make doubly sure only qualified people can vote, and then we simply accept the results.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.