MSN NL Poll: Obama Wins, Hands Down – Obama’s Strength

October 16th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

MSN Netherlands asked Dutch Internet uses who they would vote for if they were eligable to vote in the American elections. The answer will not surprise anyone, but the exact numbers may: 90% of those who answered said they would vote for Barack Obama, and Democrats in general. Only 10% said they would vote for McCain and other Republicans.

This is, of course, due to the fact that European countries are, mostly, more progressive than the United States. But it is also due to the bias in European media; McCain has not been fairly depicted fairly by most outlets on the Old Continent; he is ridiculed, and made out as an extremist, while Obama is depicted as every European’s dream: a reasonable, moderate, compassionate, effective and pragmatic politician. Additionally, it has to be said, many European Internet users are reasonably young; polls conducted by major newspapers also show Obama winning, but by a lesser, yet still significant, gap.

The above is, as I see it, one of Obama’s major strenghts – not just the bias in the media, but how Europeans think about him and Democrats in general. The relationship between Europe and the U.S. has deteriorated tremendously since George W. Bush took office in January 2001. He and his team insulted European countries on a variety of occasions, which make matters worse. Additionally, many Europeans criticize the way the U.S. has treated its terrorism suspects.

Electing Obama would almost instantly result in more respect for and appreciation of the U.S. here in Europe. It would do a tremendous lot to destroy the notion that all Americans are, deep down, little George W. Bushes (who has been turned into a caricature of course). Whether American voters like it or not – and especially conservatives – Europe is a valuable ally for their country. If the relationship between the two continues to deteriorate, or even if it does not improve significantly, both sides will have trouble passing resolutions at the UN in the coming years and, generally, getting other countries to agree to a certain policy.

Europe needs the U.S. and the U.S. needs Europe. The two need to work together, to protect their own interests, and the interests they share. Although some conservative Americans believe America should and could go it alone, the reality of the matter is that this is not possible. Electing Obama, therefore, would help the U.S. coordinate its efforts to protect its, and the West’s in general, interests. It would improve America’s image and would, therefore, make it considerably easier for European politicians to support the U.S. and to go along with its plans.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Maine
    October 17th, 2008 at 00:37
    Reply | Quote | #1

    What we need is Positive Change for every man ,woman and Child!
    We are coming close to getting back our American Dreams!

                                     Maine,

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.