Turkey Continues to Battle PKK

October 16th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags: , , ,

Turkish forces continued to fight against PKK militants yesterday The fighting killed five terrorists and five Turkish soldiers in the southeastern part of the country.

Another Turkish soldier died, and 15 were wounded, when the helicopter carrying them crashed. The Turkish army said that the heli crashed due to a technical error. The PKK, however, say they shot it down.

Fighting broke out, the military said, after PKK militants started firing at Turkish soldiers.

The war against the PKK has cost more than 40,000 lives. The PKK started its terrorism back in 1984. It says that its goal is to create an independent nation-state for Kurds. This nation-state would have to exist in parts of Turkey and Iraq.

Turkey obviously opposes these aims, and has fought against the PKK for 24 years. As it is, however, the PKK does not seem to be any weaker than they were several years ago. A major reason for this is the unwillingness of Iraq’s government to help the Turks fight the PKK. Members of the terrorist organization – recognized as such by Turkey, the United States and the European Union – commit terrorist attacks in Turkey, after which they run to northern Iraq, where they go into hiding until the next attack.

Meanwhile, the U.S. and EU have done little to nothing to help Turkey fight the PKK. One wonders whether these two will change their approach to the problem if the PKK would start killing Westerners as well. Something tells me that they would suddenly help Turkey then in every way they can.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Kemal
    October 17th, 2008 at 11:44
    Reply | Quote | #1

    Meanwhile, the U.S. and EU have done little to nothing to help Turkey fight the PKK. One wonders whether these two will change their approach to the problem if the PKK would start killing Westerners as well. Something tells me that they would suddenly help Turkey then in every way they can.

    The PKK was formed as ASALA, the terrorists which were killing Turks with nary a raised eyebrow from EU countries and the US from 1973 until the early  1990s, was disbanded.

    One of the primary reasons ASALA was disbanded was due to the bombing at Orly which killed and wounded a sizable number of Europeans.  ASALAs handlers then formed the PKK in the same neighborhoods of Lebanon in which ASALA took shelter because European nations that implicitly supported ASALA no longer would after the Orly massacre. 

    The PKK’s handlers have taken great care to ensure the PKK does not repeat the mistake ASALA made in killing non-Turks.  Thus, EU and the US have their “insurance” policies in place and the PKK has been raised to not bite the hands that either implicitly or directly feed it.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.