U.S. Citizen Remains in Pakistani Custody

October 16th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

Pakistani officials said Thursday that the 20-year old American student they arrested recently in the country’s tribal area was released. American authorities, meanwhile, say that Pakistan continues to detain Floridian Jude Kennan in Waziristan province.

Kennan was arrested when he tried to cross a checkpoint in the Mohmand tribal area, because he was travelling to the region illegally. Foreigners are not allowed to enter the tribal region, unless the government gives them explicit permission. This is because the region is controlled by the Taliban and Al Qaeda – Pakistan obviously wants to prevent more people from joining these extremist organizations.

“U.S. Embassy officials in Islamabad confirmed Thursday that Jude Kennan was still in custody and had not been released as reported,”Consular official Tara Rigler told AlArabiya.net.

Kennan is half-American and half-Pakistani. His father comes from Pakistan and now lives in the Peshawar region. “He has told us that he was a student at a community college in Florida and wanted to enter the tribal region to see a friend,” police officer Marjan Khan told Pakistan’s The News on Wednesday.

He is the second American arrested in the region; seven years ago, John Walker Lindh, a 20-year old Californian was also arrested. Lindh had joined the Taliban and actively fought on their side in the war against the U.S.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.