McCain Criticizes Media, Obama for Attacking Joe the Plumber

October 17th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags: , ,

In a speech delivered to be delivered on Friday, Senator John was set to criticize both the Obama campaign and media for going after a normal citizen, namely Joe Wurzelbacher. The media, McCain said, should not have treated “Joe the Plumber” as if he were a politician, who should be ‘vetted.’

In the speech as prepared for delivery McCain says: “The response from Senator Obama and his campaign yesterday was to attack Joe. People are digging through his personal life and he has TV crews camped out in front of his house. He didn’t ask for Senator Obama to come to his house. He wasn’t recruited or prompted by our campaign. He just asked a question. And Americans ought to be able to ask Senator Obama tough questions without being smeared and targeted with political attacks.”

Furthermore, McCain is expected to say, “[t]he question Joe asked about our economy is important, because Senator Obama’s plan would raise taxes on small businesses that employ 16 million Americans. Senator Obama’s plan will kill those jobs at just the time when we need to be creating more jobs. My plan will create jobs, and that’s what America needs.”

“Senator Obama says that he wanted to spread your wealth around. When politicians talk about taking your money and spreading it around, you’d better hold onto your wallet. Senator Obama claims that wants to give a tax break to the middle class, but not only did he vote for higher taxes on the middle class in the Senate, his plan gives away your tax dollars to those who don’t pay taxes. That’s not a tax cut, that’s welfare. America didn’t become the greatest nation on earth by redistributing wealth; we became the greatest nation by creating new wealth,” McCain will conclude.

To be fair to the Obama campaign: it does not seem that the campaign itself is going after “Joe the Plumber.” Instead, it are Obama’s allies in the media and blogosphere who do everything in their power to silence the man who asked Obama a very good question. Additionally, it has to be pointed out that the McCain campaign did not exactly help Wurzelbacher return to anonymity by mentioning the man’s name on every possible occasion and even using him in an ad.

However, that does not excuse the media and blogosphere. Both have gone insane over the man who was approached by Barack Obama himself, he did not walk up to Obama, Obama walked up to him, and who then asked Obama a very good question about taxes. The problem, in its true essence, was not what Joe said, or thought, or asked, or implied. Rather, it was Obama’s answer: “my goal is to, we wanna spread the wealth around,” Obama said.

Liberal bloggers and media personalities supportive of Obama know that this line could become a major problem for the Illinois Senator. If there is anything blue collar voters do not like, it’s a Democrat who promises to “spread the wealth around.” As most of them realize this will probably mean that, in the end, they too will see their taxes go up in order to “help” low income households.

Instead of dealing with what Obama said, however, these individuals chose to go after Wurzelbacher, the man who simply asked a question. They did this out of fear that Obama’s words could result in him losing tremendous support, and possibly even bungle the election. They went after Wurzelbacher because they, rightfully, feared that if people would talk more about the exchange between the plumber and Obama, McCain would rise in the polls, and Obama would tumble.

In other words; it was an attempt to personally destroy Wurzelbacher, so as to change the subject. When people would talk about whether or not Joe paid his taxes, they would not have time to think about Obama’s “spread the wealth around” remark.

Sadly for those individuals, I do not for one second that their plan will work. Instead, I consider it highly likely that “Average Joe” will look at what happens and think to himself “wait, so they’re just destroying a man who asked Obama a difficult question? This man is like I am. They would do this to me as well.” The result will be bad instead of good for Obama.

In response to the speech as prepared for delivery Politico published an article defending the media. This was quite interesting considering that one of the news sources McCain was undoubtedly speaking about was exactly this organization. Politico declared war on Wurzelbacher at the very moment the video of the exchange between him and Obama was published on YouTube and received attention on blogs. One cannot help but wonder whether the guys and few gals at Politico think that they are kidding anyone except themselves.

McCain’s speech seems to strike the right tone, by the way. He makes Obama’s remarks rather than “Joe the Plumber” the issue, as it should be. Nothing that Joe said could possibly result in Obama losing support; it were Obama’s own words that were potentially damaging, as the McCain campaign seems to understand full well.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.