Polls: Obama’s Lead Continues to Decrease

October 17th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

The latest published poll shows that Barack Obama’s lead to John McCain continues to decrease. Where many pollsters said days ago that Obama was leading by 7%-8%, some even more than 10%, the latest Rasmussen, Gallup and now Reuters/C-SPAN/ZOGBY polls say that increasingly more Americans seem to take McCain serious. 

According to Reuters/C-SPAN/ZOGBY 49% of voters say they support Obama, against 44% who plan to vote for McCain. Although that is still a significant lead for Obama, it is not as big a lead as his and his top advisers had hoped. Especially not because they fear that the polls are incorrect.

Obama staffers, and the man himself, were reported to believe that poll numbers were artificially high for him, and artificially low for McCain. If that is true, and Obama’s lead is only 5% in such artificial circumstance,s the differences between the two could very well fall within the margin of error.

Be that as it may, all we have are polls to work with, all of them putting Obama in the lead, which would make sense considering the unpopularity of George W. Bush, the economic crisis, and McCain’s inability to articulate his vision for America in an appealing way. 

Important to note with the latest Reuters/C-SPAN/Zogby poll is that it has a margin of error of 2.9%.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Bob A.
    October 17th, 2008 at 14:53
    Reply | Quote | #1

    Speaking of polls.. confirm your polling stations, check your affiliation and get a sneak peak of your ballot before you vote. 

    http://www.votersunite.org/info/RegInfo.asp

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.