Connecticut Rep. Shays in Tight Race

October 18th, 2008 By: Michael Merritt | Tags:

I’ve admittedly been paying less attention to the races in my own state than I should be, so I’ll be paying some more attention in the coming weeks.  Technically, there are two races to look at, but officially there’s really only one that’s tight: that of long-time Republican Representative Christopher Shays versus Democratic opponent Jim Himes.

Shays is the last Republican Congressman in New England to cling on to his seat, and mostly because he repesents the somewhat conservative fourth district.  The fourth district is the one that borders New York, and so houses many wealthy CEOs and other high-level execs.

The problem for Shays is that he may be in trouble this year.  He hung on by the his teeth in 2006 as it is, winning by 6,645 votes.  As the Courant puts it:

In a poll conducted for Roll Call, a Capitol Hill newspaper, on Monday and Tuesday, SurveyUSA found Himes leading, 48 percent to 45 percent — and Barack Obama opening a 22-percentage point lead over John McCain in the Fairfield County district.

Kerry won the district in 2004 too, but weakly, by about 8 points.  Shays certainly can’t be happy that Obama is doing so well in his district right now.

In 2006, two other Republicans, Nancy Johnson of the 5th district, and Rob Simmons of the 2nd district, were voted out and replaced by Chris Murphy and Joe Courtney.  Courtney won against Simmons by only 94 votes, so it prompted a recount.  The trouble for Shays is that like Simmons, he’s rather moderate, even moreso than John McCain.  Simmons couldn’t make it in 2006, and if Shays is struggling in the polls now, he has reason to be worried.  Then again, some polls had his 2006 challenger Diane Farrell winning comfortably in the days leading up the election and Shays still won.

As for the newbie Congressmen, it seems that Joe Courtney is likely to keep his seat and Murphy probably will too.  The other two representatives, John Larson and Rosa DeLauro, are not going anywhere soon.  So, it’s only a matter of time before we see whether Shays will get lucky too.

In a year when Republicans all over are doing bad, even the most liberal of them are not safe.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.