Defending Noonan

October 18th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

Writing for Right Wing News, conservative blogger Melissa Clouthier criticizes Peggy Noonan for criticizing Sarah Palin and the ‘type’ of Republicans she ‘represents’ and, above all, appeals to. According to Clouthier, Noonan is simply an elitist snob who seemingly dislikes the ‘base Republican’ from the Republican heartland.

That is, according to Clouthier, wrong.

Sadly, I feel compelled to defend Noonan on this one. The average rank and file Republican Clouthier talks about (Limbaugh fans, Christian fundamentalists, and so on) should indeed be disliked by those with important positions in the Republican Party and above all by the intellectuals behind the party.  These rank and file Republicans, the ones Clouthier speaks about and seemingly considers herself to be part of, are exactly those who turned the GOP into a caricature of itself in recent years. They have taken over the Republican Party, and turned it from a solid, thoughtful conservative party into one of fundamentalist Christians, intolerant xenophobes, and unlimited government spending while refusing to pay any taxes.

These are the same people who constantly push for ‘anti-gay marriage amendments’ to the Constitution, and who find the most important issue to be abortion. 

Noonan is right to rebel against those individuals – who often do indeed run the most right-wing blogs, who used ‘citizen journalism’ in order to advance their, frankly, radical agendas – and to try to reclaim her party and her ideology. The kind of conservatism the others want, has proved harmful for the country as a whole, the relationship with the rest of the world, and for the Republican Party itself. If people like Noonan would have more power, and would set the agenda of the party, the GOP would appeal to far more people than it does right now; the Reagan era would come back full force.

And before people say that Reagan was one of those conservatives Noonan despises: no he was not. He paid lip service to their demands, but he was most certainly not one of them. 

Which is exactly why he was able to convince so many Democrats and Independents to vote for him.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Michael van der Galien
    October 18th, 2008 at 21:21
    Reply | Quote | #1

    Elitist SNOB is what she is…


    Yes she is.

    Which is why I like her.
  2. c3
    October 18th, 2008 at 23:00
    Reply | Quote | #2

    Gosh, we haven’t eve had the elections yest and the second-guessing, recriminations and blaming has already started.

  3. Michael Merritt
    October 18th, 2008 at 23:10
    Reply | Quote | #3

    They have taken over the Republican Party, and turned it from a solid, thoughtful conservative party into one of fundamentalist Christians, intolerant xenophobes, and unlimited government spending while refusing to pay any taxes.

    This is why I never seriously considered becoming a Republican.  This branch of the party screwed that right up for me.

  4. Michael van der Galien
    October 18th, 2008 at 23:34
    Reply | Quote | #4

    Gosh, we haven’t eve had the elections yest and the second-guessing, recriminations and blaming has already started.

    c3: I think you’re wrong about one thing – it’s not blaming, etc. right now. It’s actually something else altogether; it’s an internal battle that should have been fought 2 years ago. Instead, both sides delayed what had to come, and we now see that they cannot control themselves any longer, and the war erupts at the very moment Republicans should unite if they want to win.
  5. c3
    October 19th, 2008 at 02:56
    Reply | Quote | #5

    Michael;
    <i>it’s an internal battle that should have been fought 2 years ago. </i>

    What happened to the “big tent”

  6. Michael van der Galien
    October 19th, 2008 at 10:01
    Reply | Quote | #7

    “The Big Tent” ended when conservatives like Noonan realized they were being used as intellectual excuses, but with little to no influence in the party itself.

  7. Rignerd
    October 20th, 2008 at 16:51
    Reply | Quote | #8

    Peggy Noonan was selected as a speech writer for Reagan because she was talented at taking ideals and expressing them in words that were uplifting and inspiring.  As a fan of Peggy Noonan I must say that I love Sarah Palin because her life is inspiring and uplifting.  She is pro life even when it is hard and personal.  She is self reliant and self confident without being arrogant.  She does what is right even when the people on her team are doing what is wrong and she will stand up to them and win.
    Yes I am a Christian, you can call me a fundamentalist if you think its an insult,  and a conservative.  I accept all people into my party, the Lord commands us to love the sinner but not the sin.  So when some “moderate” says i should be thrown out of MY party because I believe the institution of marriage is working and shouldn’t be changed to fit some progressive definition, then i wonder why they don’t join the progressive party and work with the others who believe as they do.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.