Democratic Rep. Mahoney Admits “Multiple Affairs”

October 18th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

Democratic Representative Tim Mahoney admitted Friday that he had more than one affair, but denied he had broken the law (in order to cover up his adultery).

The shameless Representative from Florida said that one of the affairs begun at the very moment he was running on a family values platform in order to oust disgraced Republican Congressman Mark Foley.
Mahoney proceeded to apologize to his wife, children and constituents. At the same time, however, he inexplicably said he was not a hypocrite.

“I can understand why people would feel that way and for those people, all I can say is, ‘I’m sorry I let you down,’” Mahoney said.

When reporters asked how many affairs Mahoney had exactly had, he refused to answer. “You’re asking me over a lifetime? I’m just saying I’ve been unfaithful and I’m sorry for that,” he said instead.

Mahoney is not only accused of having affairs, but also of possibly breaking the law. The FBI has opened an investigation in order to see whether he abused his power and influence to help his mistresses. He is suspected of potentially having paid one of them off to keep quiet about their relationship and of giving preferential treatment to Martin County because he had an affair with a Martin County official.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Michael Merritt
    October 18th, 2008 at 22:09
    Reply | Quote | #1

    Oh, representatives of Florida’s 16th.  What scandals won’t you involve yourself in?

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.