Controversial Court Case Starts in Turkey

October 20th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

The Turkish government has, finally, decided to take the individuals its suspects of preparing to stage a coup (by violence) to court. Today marks the first day of the trial: 68 defendants are accused of illegally trying to topple the regime of Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan and President Abdullah Gul.

They are, prosecutors say, part of an extremist secularist organization, whose goal it was to create massive chaos and instability in Turkey, which would then force the Turkish military to stage a coup and to get rid of the moderate Islamist party the Justice and Development Party (AK Parti in Turkish).

To call the trial controversial would be an understatement. Most Turks believe that something was most certainly going on, but they are skeptical about the government’s far-reaching claims. This group of individuals includes normal, moderate, secularists. Most of them strongly oppose those who want to rid the country of the Islamist AK Parti by violence. They believe the AKP can and should be stopped by legal and democratic means.

However, there are also those who support the government unquestionably, these people are generally Islamists themselves, who consider secularists of all stripes the main enemy, and those who believe that it’s all a farce. The latter support the ones on trial now.

When the defendants were brought to court, a group of such supporters were waving signs and chanting.” The real traitors are in Parliament,” the protesters chanted, “the real patriots in prison.”

Although it seems likely that something was indeed going on in Turkey, it is also likely that the AK Parti has blown it out of proportion out of revenge for the closure case against it, which it eventually survived by only one vote, and used it as an excuse to cramp down on each and all opposition. Secularists who were vocal in their opposition to the Islamists were all arrested, put in prison, refused to the right to defend themselves, and could only wait for weeks or months until they would finally find out what they were accused of exactly or be released. 

Erdogan and Gul have not made themselves popular in Europe with this case; most European leaders realize that something may have indeed been going on, but also know that the AK Parti has used the case as an excuse to oppress and silence critics.

In the coming days and weeks, we will find out how many of the claims made by the AKP were correct, and how many false. Stay tuned.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Nevin
    October 21st, 2008 at 04:25
    Reply | Quote | #1

    I SO desperately want to believe that “real democracy” is at play here by the current government trying to unravel the dark shadowy games that has been played upon the civilians, politicians and journalists in the past. But the sad truth is, AKP is part of that oppressive, undemocratic, slippery system they are so trying to bring down. It is almost comical! If one really try to dig deep down into the shadows, one would find various Western powers at play… Many of your readers may not like what I am about to say, but I think the real powers behind all the shady business in the last 50 years is Imperialism at it’s worst! Turkey is an occupied country…. Turks can never find out the truth behind the staged coupes, assassinations of journalist and various unrest in the past unless the country was free of any foreign influence.

  2. Harold
    October 21st, 2008 at 21:57
    Reply | Quote | #2

    Hi,

    I just wanted to let you know that THEWEEK.com has featured and linked to this piece as Best Opinion. We really enjoyed your take on the subject.

    Thanks, and all the best,
    Harold Maass
    Online Editor
    THEWEEK.com

  3. Michael van der Galien
    October 21st, 2008 at 22:18
    Reply | Quote | #3

    Harold, thanks, that’s more than appreciated; and I encourage readers to pay The Week a visit.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.