McCain Going for Pennsylvania

October 21st, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

CNN reported Tuesday that the McCain campaign was considering giving up on Colorado, a state that has not supported a Democrat in presidential elections in over 20 years. McCain is down 5% in the latest Colorado polls, which is indeed quite some, but which should not be considered unovercomable.

On the other hand, the McCain will now focus completely on Pennsylvania. The strange thing? McCain is down 10% or more in most recent polls.

Yet, the McCain campaign seemingly believes that they can make a comeback in this state, yet not in Colorado, where the gap is twice as small.

A top adviser to McCain told CNN: “The election hinges on Pennsylvania. We’ll win Virginia and Nevada in the end, but lose without Pennsylvania.”

Another top adviser said that they “are not giving up on Colorado” but “need to have a math scenario that doesn’t count on” winning this state. In that math scenario, they need Pennsylvania.

Barack Obama’s campaign is spending $1 million on advertisements in Colorado every week right now. The McCain campaign is also spending big time, yet is unable to keep up; McCain spends $700,000 a week on advertisements now, and will continue to do so until election day, or so some advisers say.

The same adviser who said they are not giving up on Colorado said the campaign could very well end up spending $1.5 million a week on advertisements in this state. Since McCain has less money to spend than Obama, however, they have to be careful; they can only spend the money once. When they spend so heavily, they have to carry the state.

Meanwhile, McCain is now ahead in Florida and Ohio polls, two other important battleground states. Sadly for McCain, however, all battleground states are must wins for him, making it virtually impossible for him to beat Obama – who is now even taking on McCain in traditionally Republican strongholds.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. fester
    October 21st, 2008 at 14:39
    Reply | Quote | #1

    Speaking as a Western Pennsylvanian, this move makes almost no sense to me.  I am seeing some internal documents that suggests the PA race is a little closer, or at least a lot softer of an Obama lead than most of the public polling suggests (McCain has growth potential in the traditional Republican base area of the “T” and Appalachia), but I have seen jack squat on GOP GOTV operations, and the Congressional candidates are in every man for themselves mode right now.

    This does not make a lot of sense to me…

  2. Michael Merritt
    October 22nd, 2008 at 01:47
    Reply | Quote | #2

    I’m kind of with fester.  Although McCain would look good being in Penn, he definitely needs states he knows he has a chance in.

    Obviously, if McCain can afford it, all states he can afford and are not winning should be fair game.  But I hope McCain isn’t really focusing on Penn completely.  That would be a terrible mistake.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.