Poll: Murtha Trailing Russell in Pennsylvania

October 23rd, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

U.S. Representative John Murtha could very well lose his seat in Congress, conservative syndicated columnist Michelle Malkin reported Thursday. According to a recent poll, Murtha trails his Republican rival Bill Russell by 13%.

The news comes days after another poll that showed Murtha ahead by only 4%, a small lead considering that incumbents like him always have a big advantage.

Unlike most other Republicans running for Congress this year, Russel has presented himself as a true American conservative – a candidate who wants to reform Congress, by bringing conservative rather than progressive change. Or even centrist change.

A major reason for Russell’s current success is that Murtha recently called West Pennsylvanians “racists,” and later “rednecks,” when trying to explain to journalists why Barack Obama may have a harder time winning this state than many people think. As should be obvious this did not go over well with Pennsylvanians.

Then there is another reason: Murtha is one of the biggest spenders in Congress. He may be the incumbent, but he is also famous for the pork he connects to every single bill that passes his office, and he has a long record of insulting his opponents, and even members of the United States military (marines, for instance, were condemned by Murtha for committing a mass murder; they were later found innocent).

Lastly, conservative activists have finally found a candidate they can wholeheartedly support in Russell, and another candidate they can passionately oppose. Conservatives everywhere have spent considerable time and attention to Russell, and asked their readers to support his candidacy by either donating money to his campaign or, of course, going out on the streets to convince Pennsylvanians to vote for the retired Lieutenant Colonel.

He is one of the very few Republican candidates for Congress this year able to inspire the ‘netroots.’

In a year when Democrats seem poised to increase their majorities in the Senate and House of Representatives, it seems that one Democrat may very well lose his seat. Murtha now faces an uphill battle, a battle against his own statements, gaffes, and spending… and against an inspired and energized Republican base in Pennsylvania.

Exit question: could this spell trouble for Obama’s chances of winning in Pennsylvania?

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. marc
    October 24th, 2008 at 00:32
    Reply | Quote | #1

    That Murtha is behind is very good news.  Democracy’s up-side is demonstrated when one of the corrupt is called home by the voters, whether in the primaries or the general election.

    While this race looks like it will have a positive outcome, I still believe terms limits should be put in place for Congress.

  2. Scot
    October 24th, 2008 at 04:08
    Reply | Quote | #2

    I sent $25 to Lt. Col. Russell today (http://www.russellbrigade.com).  Took <1 minute through paypal.  I encourage others to do the same.  Lt. Col. Russell is a great American.  Murtha is a political hack and deserves to lose.

  3. Interested
    October 24th, 2008 at 08:33
    Reply | Quote | #3

    he should have been given the boot a long time ago.  Murtha was less than stellar in 06 and he has gone downhill ever since.  Not surprised but good to see a viable candidate.

  4. Roger
    November 3rd, 2008 at 06:16
    Reply | Quote | #4

    Why can’t the republican Party find candidates like this for every single district?

    The RNC needs a total house cleaning! State after state they have shown poor leadership and have left the door open for the liberals to take over, California is a classic example. We as conservatives should demand more from our leaders!

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.