<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Study: Coverage of McCain Far More Negative than Obama</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.poligazette.com/2008/10/23/study-coverage-of-mccain-far-more-negative-than-obama/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2008/10/23/study-coverage-of-mccain-far-more-negative-than-obama/</link>
	<description>Because Common Sense Transcends Distance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 22:45:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: your mom</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2008/10/23/study-coverage-of-mccain-far-more-negative-than-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-74340</link>
		<dc:creator>your mom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 17:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.poligazette.com/?p=7893#comment-74340</guid>
		<description>durrr maybe its because McCain is running a campaign based in negativity while Barack Obama is talking about solving problems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>durrr maybe its because McCain is running a campaign based in negativity while Barack Obama is talking about solving problems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: c3</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2008/10/23/study-coverage-of-mccain-far-more-negative-than-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-74338</link>
		<dc:creator>c3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 16:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.poligazette.com/?p=7893#comment-74338</guid>
		<description>This is a powerful story and should be required reading for &quot;both sides&quot;  Intriguing to see the unprecedented amount of positive Obama coverage early in the campaign.  Also interesting to read about the &quot;echo effect&quot;  (big chunk of positive coverage comes after an initial &quot;neutral&quot; story then public reaction).  Here for me is the most telling part of the story:
&quot;In many ways, the arc of the media narrative during this phase of the 2008 general election might be best described as a drama in which John McCain has acted and Barack Obama has reacted.&quot;


Is that not also true of their Senatorial careers (Or maybe better  &quot;John McCain has acted and Barack Obama has spoken&quot;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a powerful story and should be required reading for &#8220;both sides&#8221;  Intriguing to see the unprecedented amount of positive Obama coverage early in the campaign.  Also interesting to read about the &#8220;echo effect&#8221;  (big chunk of positive coverage comes after an initial &#8220;neutral&#8221; story then public reaction).  Here for me is the most telling part of the story:<br />
&#8220;In many ways, the arc of the media narrative during this phase of the 2008 general election might be best described as a drama in which John McCain has acted and Barack Obama has reacted.&#8221;</p>
<p>Is that not also true of their Senatorial careers (Or maybe better  &#8221;John McCain has acted and Barack Obama has spoken&#8221;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
