Possible People in an Obama Administration

October 25th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

According to the New York Times, Barack Obama is already forming an administration. Furthermore, a draft of his inauguration speech has, the Times says, already been written.

Although some may call that prematurely or even arrogant, I think that the arrogance or prematurely criticism is useless. What matters is that Obama is indeed likely to win and that it is, therefore, interesting to look at some of the people who may play an important role in the administration of America’s 44th president.

Here’s a list with some names:

Chief of staff: former South Dakota Senator Tom Daschle, Illinois Rep. Rahm Emanuel, former Commerce Secretary William M. Daley, former Clinton White House chief of staff John Podesta, Obama’s Senate chief of staff Pete Rouse.

Treasury secretary: president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York Timothy F. Geithner, former Federal Reserve chief Paul A. Volcker, former Treasury Secretaries Robert E. Rubin and Lawrence H. Summers.

Defense secretary: Current Defense secretary Robert M. Gates.

Veterans affairs secretary: Current Veterans affairs secretary Dr. James B. Peake

Although these are only a couple of names, they are reasonably encouraging for those who hope that an Obama administration will be reasonably moderate. It would mean that at least one, possibly more Republicans will have a seat at the table after Republicans lose the elections for Congress and the White House, and that moderate conservatives may be taken seriously.

If true, a hopeful sign indeed.

Of course, it could also be spin in order to influence public opinion positively and thereby convincing people that Obama will not pursue as many liberal policies as some fear. That too has to be kept in mind.

Also: it seems that liberal bloggers are less positively impressed by the list than me, although others seem reasonably neutral, believing, for one thing, that a possible McCain administration will be horrific.

Why not mention the names mentioned for a possible McCain administration? He’s not going to win. Obama will win, I believe, and all election news should be covered as such; it’s time to look beyond November 4.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Michael Merritt
    October 25th, 2008 at 23:54
    Reply | Quote | #1

    I don’t think it’s spin. As far as I remember, Obama’s had nothing but praise for the job Gates is doing.

  2. c3
    October 26th, 2008 at 04:10
    Reply | Quote | #2

    But he’s not going to change the presidential seal, correct?

  3. marc
    October 26th, 2008 at 07:13
    Reply | Quote | #3

    Susan, you’re right that McCain has to be more careful in how he handles Obama – the Clintons’ demise demonstrates that clearly.

    But I think that reining in your seemingly pathological hatred of Obama would be a good idea. Like it or not, his election is almost certain and we all have to get through the next 4 years, preferably in peace.

  4. daveinboca
    October 26th, 2008 at 08:28
    Reply | Quote | #4

    I agree with Susan that Obama is largely a confection created by the press and wishful thinking by right-brained softies and gullible females. Obama is a consummate opportunist and the ultra-left bias of the media [except for talk radio] in the US has sold the country a bill of shoddy goods.

    I did consultative work and production for all three networks plus PBS in the eighties and the prevailing vibe was completely left-wing Democrat with an abiding hatred of Reagan and family/religious values in general. The situation has devolved into active agitprop on behalf of the Dems, since all pretense of journalistic values has disappeared.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.