Health Care Reform in the Coming Four Years
America has, admittedly a big problem with regards to the sheer amount of people who do not have health insurance. This is a major problem which has to be resolved. Barack Obama and Democrats in general have plans to insure these people, which is very important and, in general, a good thing.
However, while reforming their health care system Americans would be wise to keep as much good from the old system as they can. Lest they forget, the American health care system is also the main source of health innovation in the world. The high level of competition and the free market system in the health care system encourage innovation and improvement in treatments and technologies, not developed in other parts of the world.
If Democrats take control of Congress, with possibly as much as 57 or even 60 Senators in combination with a large majority in the House of Representatives, they are likely to ignore this side of the current American health care system, and to focus completely on trying to insure every single American. This could cause problems in the coming years, for radical change in the health care system may very well destroy its innovation ability.
If Americans want to create a new health care system, that covers more people than it currently does, but that remains competitive with the rest of the world and, above all else, innovative, they will would be wise to force Democrats in the coming years to take conservative complaints serious. If Democrats win as many seats in Congress as most expect, they will not feel forced to do so, and they will be likely to destroy not only the weaknesses of the current health care system, but also its strengths.
That would be devastating both for the U.S. itself and for the rest of the world, which relies heavily on American innovations in this field.
This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.
Comments are closed.
PoliGazette Comments Policy
PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree.
Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate
these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors.
Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue
publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.
(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly
or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that
respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should
not be posted.
(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.
(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional
reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.
(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not
include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement
the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.
(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements.
Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or
that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat
slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.
Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors
by email only.
What neither party seems willing to do and is an absolute must for reducing health care costs is taking on the AMA. The AMA has put a strangle hold on the number of medical schools and therefor the number of physicians. The licensing of med schools needs to be removed from their hands and the number of schools needs to be radically increased. It is absolutely ridiculous that a B in freshman comp or other courses unrelated to the profession can keep someone from becoming a physician.
The role of nurses at all levels needs to be expanded as well.
The cost of a new accreditation board for doctors and med schools would be trivial in relation to how much this would save under any of the proposed health plans.