U.S. Training Pakistani Army

October 26th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

Although the relationship between the United States and Pakistan has deteriorated in recent months, the two sides are still working together in the war on terrorism.

According to recent media reports, the U.S. military has, for instance, started training Pakistani soldiers to fight militants in the country’s tribal region.

CNN reported Sunday that ‘[t]he Pakistanis trained by the U.S. contingent — which includes Army Special Forces troops — will in turn become trainers for Frontier Corps troops on the front lines fighting the militants.’

Pakistani Lt. Col. Attique Rehman confirmed the same details to CNN on Saturday.

‘Members of the Frontier Corps are ethnic Pashtuns recruited from Pakistan’s tribal region. They are on the front lines in the fight against militants along the Afghan border but they’ve long had a reputation of being poorly trained and underfunded,’ CNN said in its report.

It is an important development: the U.S. has threatened to fight against Al Qaeda and Taliban forces in Pakistan, regardless of what Islamabad would think about such cross border operations, but the best solution for all involved is, of course, to have the Pakistani army fight said militants.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.