Former Edwards, Clinton, Obama Speech Writer Turns Republican

October 28th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

Former speechwriter and Democrat Wendy Button explains for the Daily Beast why she has decided to reregister as an Independent this year, and to vote for Senator John McCain and Governor Sarah Palin in the election for president.

As becomes clear from reading her column, Button’s view is that the Democratic Party has left her. It has changed, she argues, and not for the better.

Where the Democratic Party was once proud to say it represented Middle Class America, Button writes, it has now turned into a party of the elite which hates the middle class. A symbol of this was the way Democrats went after Joe Wurzelbacher when he had the guts to ask Barack Obama a question about his tax policies.

For his courage, Wurzelbacher was destroyed.

And then there was the overt sexist campaign against Hillary Clinton. This too turned Button, quite a feminist, off. She saw that Clinton was destroyed purely based on sexism. Whenever the sexism card could be used, it was used. Not only by the Obama campaign, but mostly by his friends and allies in the media.

If Obama and other Democrats truly supported emancipation for women, Button argues, they should have condemned these sexist attacks.

Then there were the attacks against Palin. According to Button, these attacks too were often highly sexist, and dishonest. Dishonesty is always part of politics, and has always been part of it, but when it came to Palin, Democrats and their allies went overboard. They employed more dishonest tactics than ever used before, all in an attempt to destroy a woman simply because she would appeal to middle class white women.

Lastly, the issue that truly drove Button, seemingly a fiscal moderate, into the hands of the Republican ticket was the promise of Democrats such as Barney Frank, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi and of course Barack Obama to raise taxes on businesses, and later others in order to pay for tremendously expansive new programs. As Button rightfully puts it, it is unwise to raise taxes during times of crisis. If you take money away from those who earn it, they will have less to spend, meaning that the economy will suffer more in the long run, for demand will go down, resulting in production going down as well. Less production means fewer jobs.

It is interesting that the Democratic Party is increasingly positioning itself as a Social Democratic party, which is to a large degree a novelty for America. Even the policies of most liberal presidents in American history were aimed at ’spreading opportunity,’ as Senator John McCain called it yesterday while campaigning in Ohio. The new Democratic Party, however, is not interested in spreading ‘opportunity,’ but in ’spreading wealth.’

Some moderate Democrats are clearly unhappy with that shift, and are ready and willing to turn to the Republican Party for fiscal policies that make more sense, and that continue the age-old tradition of equality of opportunity rather than of outcome in the U.S.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Chance Haywood
    October 29th, 2008 at 05:53
    Reply | Quote | #1

    As someone who went to college with the intention of becoming a political speech writer I have long admired the work Wendy put forth. It was a great pleasure to read her thoughts about how this election has unfolded. I just hope her coming out doesn’t cost her a career.

  2. mshill
    October 29th, 2008 at 20:27
    Reply | Quote | #2

    I have always loved Wendy’s work also…What she is saying is down right
    dangerous for the American people…Everyone knows that Hillary should have became president..It was snatched from her by the media and the elite. I don’t see how Obama can pull off everything he says he is…He is not Franklin D Roosevelt..And he is dangerous as far as I am concerned…It is not right to spread wealth around, but make it so everyone can have a piece of the pie if they choose. I can’t vote for
    McCain….If I set at home, I am throwing my vote away. What am I to
    do…I don’t want to vote for a third party….Unless the republicans
    throws this election, Obama is the winner…Are we all winners then…
    Or are we going down the snake river and hitting the rafts….I tell you
    people if you are not praying people, you better now….Our country is
    at stake….your children’s future is at stake….

  3. Henry
    October 30th, 2008 at 01:03
    Reply | Quote | #3

    Thank you for reporting on this.

  4. Linnae
    October 30th, 2008 at 05:04
    Reply | Quote | #4

    Smells fishy to me. No one paying attention, let alone actually explaining his policies, would think he’s “spreading the wealth”. It’s the same tax scale that Clinton had. And Joe the Plumber was picked apart by the media, not the Democrats. This whole thing doesn’t seem right.

  5. C Stanley
    October 30th, 2008 at 14:59
    Reply | Quote | #5

    No one paying attention, let alone actually explaining his policies, would think he’s “spreading the wealth”.

    So Obama himself hasn’t been paying attention to his own policies and campaign utterances? Those were his own words- that he thinks it’s best to spread the wealth!

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.