London Buses Could Run Atheist Ads

October 28th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

For the first time in history it seems likely that British atheists will advertise atheism on buses in the city.

Atheist comedy writer Ariane Sherine, 28, decided to call for a movement to put atheist advertisements on buses after she had traveled in some in which Christian advertisements could be read, some of them arguing that one will go to hell if one would not quickly repent and convert to Christianity.

Since Sherine is an atheist she was shocked to read the ads and decided to fight back. She put together a movement that would collect thousands of pounds in order to pay for atheist advertisements, in order to counter the Christian ones. Her initiative was supported by many prominent atheists such as Prof. Richard Dawkins.

The British Humanist Association also joined the party, resulting in Sherine collecting more than enough to run ads on London’s buses.

Transport for London, meanwhile, would not automatically dismiss the ads, saying that if the ads were approved by the board, they would run them on their network. However, at this point, the organization said, no such request from any atheist movement had been received.

“No advertisement of this kind has been submitted to TfL at this time,” a spokesman for TL said.

Christian organizations and the Church of England, meanwhile, said that although they could not possibly applaud the effort, they would defend the right of atheists to advertise their views on public transportation. After all, the Church of England said, everyone has the right to share their religious, philosophical and humanist views with the world. In Britain at least.

And this is where the Church and England and I agree with each other completely. It is, in my opinion, a bit strange to see militant atheism increasing these days, but in the end, atheists have the right to express their views just like religious people. If they want to convince believers that they believe in a myth, a fairytale and that they will be happier if they would drop their faith and, instead, embrace atheism, that is their right.

It is, as far as I know, the first time in history, at least in the West, that atheists become so vocal. You could, very ironically, call these specific atheists evangelicals (bringers of the ‘good news,’ albeit a different kind of ‘good news’ than Christanity’s evangelism). As a religious person myself, though, I cannot help but wonder what the long term effects of this movement will be on societies in the West. It is not as if Westerners are too religious as it is. As a religious person, I am of the belief that we have become too secular, with the result of losing our moral foundation, the moral values our fathers held dear, mostly for very good reason.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Michael Merritt
    October 29th, 2008 at 03:32
    Reply | Quote | #1

    I don’t know about the movement, but the message the group is using isn’t “militant” in my book. Kind of humorous actually. The “that gave me a chuckle” kind of humor.

    You know how I think about militant atheists. But this ad campaign is far from militant.

  2. Chris
    October 29th, 2008 at 11:25
    Reply | Quote | #2

    “I cannot help but wonder what the long term effects of this movement will be on societies in the West.”

    I wouldn’t worry too much. Just look at Sweden – it has the lowest levels of religious observance but it is a thriving, contented society with far fewer social problems and far less violent crime than the USA.

  3. Nevin
    October 29th, 2008 at 13:45
    Reply | Quote | #3

    I did not even know there was “militant atheists”? What an odd way of looking at the issue. This is a very religious oriented world and if you are a non believer, you are mostly shunned, told horrible things like “you will go to hell, you will burn, you are collecting so many sins until eternity” etc. So I think if there is any type of militancy, it is mostly on the side of the religious, not atheists. For the issue of advertisement; I am disappointed that, there was religious advertisement in the first place. This is when you take God away from spirituality and put it in the hands of the manipulative people who will use the average Joe to it’s own means…. Yes, this ad was made in a comical fashion, but is in a way telling the public that none believers should be respected and left alone. Constant preaching can get tiring.. Good for Londoners!!!

  4. erik
    October 29th, 2008 at 14:46
    Reply | Quote | #4

    Their slogan I find rather amusing. It’s because of God that I have stopped worrying and enjoy my life! Seems to me there is more to worry about if there is no God!

  5. Kemal
    October 29th, 2008 at 16:44
    Reply | Quote | #5

    Michael, I’m a bit confused by your choice of words: “militant atheism”. Why do you consider what this group militant? Is it because they want to put up advertising about atheism? If that is the case, are the Christian groups advertising on London’s buses also militant? I’m a bit puzzled… It’s ok to be religious, and it’s ok to be non-religious provided you are an upstanding citizen.

    Religion was initially used to regulate behavior/morality through fear of the unknown. Then behavior/morality came to be regulated by the state through legislation/laws. As people of different faiths mix and mingle, regulation of behavior and morals will come to rely more and more upon legislation/laws which will most likely be a comprise between different value systems (i.e., different religious teachings). It is only natural that as legislation/laws replace religion as a behavior regulator, some will let go of faith based beliefs.

    What is important is that we respect each others’ right to believe or not.

  6. Nevin
    October 29th, 2008 at 19:01
    Reply | Quote | #6

    My thoughts exactly Kemal! Very good point. I think that is why he may have erased my earlier comments (If he did of course, I do not know, but my comments were erased). Somebody at Poligazette thought I was a militant atheist. :) I am sorry but that is comical….

  7. Nevin
    October 29th, 2008 at 19:03
    Reply | Quote | #7

    Correction/Clarification: I know it was not the author of this article… somebody else. It does not matter who, but my point is, as soon as religion is criticized, somebody gets upset and that is what is the problem here…

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.