FIRE: QU Limits Students’ Rights

October 29th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) published a report Wednesday in which the famous Quinnipiac University is criticized for acting in breach with its students’ individual rights.

Quinnipiac University (QU) has threatened a student chapter of the Society of Professional Journalists with expulsion from campus if the group associates with The Quad News, an independent student newspaper formed in response to QU’s attacks on students’ press freedom. The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) is calling on the university, known for its political polling operation, to either permit freedom of association on campus or publicly declare that it no longer guarantees basic student rights.

“After driving last year’s editors of the primary student newspaper off campus, QU has declared the students’ new paper an enemy, limited its access to administrators, and has even threatened another student group with de-recognition simply for associating with the paper,” FIRE President Greg Lukianoff said. “Journalists rely on Quinnipiac’s polls, but the school itself is showing genuine contempt for its own student journalists. Quinnipiac should honor its purported commitment to freedom of expression by respecting the free speech of its student press.”

The ordeal for the QU student press began in spring 2007, when QU prohibited the student editors of The Quinnipiac Chronicle from publishing news online prior to the same news appearing in print. QU President John Lahey defended this prior restraint by saying he wanted to be able to read the news in print “before the external world hears about it.” After then-Chronicle editor-in-chief Jason Braff challenged the policy, Vice President for Public Affairs Lynn Bushnell stated that “student leaders, especially those in paid positions, are expected to generally be supportive of university policies.”

When QU went so far as to take control over the selection of this year’s Chronicle staff in an effort to better control the paper, the paper’s editors and applicants abandoned the Chronicle and founded an independent online news source, The Quad News, which began publishing this semester.

Again QU responded furiously:

Earlier this semester, students in QU’s chapter of the Society of Professional Journalists (SPJ) and student members of The Quad News jointly participated in activities held on campus. On September 8, in response to these interactions, Daniel W. Brown, Director of QU’s Student Center and Student Leadership Development, wrote to Jaclyn Hirsch, who is both SPJ president and managing editor of The Quad News. Brown’s letter stated that “any further interaction or endorsements with The QUAD News [sic] could result in the Quinnipiac University Chapter of the Society of Professional Journalists losing its recognition status.” While QU’s 2008-2009 Student Handbook states that independent organizations such as The Quad News may not “operate on campus,” Brown’s letter bans “interaction” altogether.

Since QU is a public university its actions are clearly in breach with the first amendment, which protects individuals’ right to associate with whomever they wish.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Michael Merritt
    October 30th, 2008 at 01:47
    Reply | Quote | #1

    Quinnipiac is a private university. Not sure where you heard otherwise.

    So, they are within their rights to make whatever rules they want, but as one of the leaders of opinion polling, you’d think they’d want to show an example by allowing freedom of the press.

    The thing with the newspaper is very similar to something that happened a couple years ago at my college. The student board threatened to withhold funding if the paper didn’t hold a public referendum on going completely online.

    The difference is that my college was public.

  2. Grewgills
    October 30th, 2008 at 04:57
    Reply | Quote | #2

    They have lifted the gag order which is a good first step. Hopefully cooler heads will prevail.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.