A Liberal Activist Revolution

October 30th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

Ta-Nehisi Coates writes for the Atlantic, that liberal activists and bloggers have made a tremendous mistake in past years by blaming others for their own defeats at the polls. According to Coates, the Barack Obama campaign proves that when liberals get their stuff together, organize, refuse to lose and use technology to the fullest, they can win elections, and by quite a landslide as well. As such, Coates argues, liberal activists will have to continue traveling down the path of this year’s campaign.

Although many liberal activists are currently celebrating the success of the Democratic Party and especially of the Obama campaign, Coates argues that they can still do a lot to improve themselves. In order to do so, Coates believes, they will have to learn to articulate their message more clearly.

“No one has conspired to deprive us of power over the past few decades. The American people aren’t stupid. We’ve sucked at articulating our message. If you have any interest in a more progressive country, we need to be honest. At the presidential level, at least, conservatives have hammered us. Give them their due. Don’t blame Rush. Don’t blame Kristol. Don’t denigrate states you’ve never visited. Give them their due. Give them their respect. Study them, and then get better,” he writes.

“Liberals are the wimp at the end of the bar. There is a gorgeous red-head, just down the way, working on her third vodka gimlet. Some herb-ass dude is blustering  in her ear, but she’s winking at you. She walks over and buys you a drink. She’s waiting on you to ask for the math. But you want to talk her head off about how things like this never happen to you. About how you always spill your drink, or trip and fall trying to get off your bar-stool. It makes her want to go back and talk to the blustery herb just on GP. And she would–if the herb had any GP to speak of.”

He then calls on his fellow liberals to recognize what is happening in the United States right now, to stop nagging and fearing they may still lose, but to work on improving themselves nonetheless. “Folks, we are watching a revoloution. I’m talking about the technology, the GOTV effort, the historic numbers for black voters, a sick, sick edge among young voters. Are we going to spend the next days trying to concoct exotic scenarios in which the dastardly Republicans steal this one? Are black folks going to sit around wondering if white people will revert back to their Yacubic nature? Or are we going to start thinking about the change taking place right before our eyes, and what it means for our agenda? What will we do? I’m not asking for self-congratulation–just some self-confidence,” Coates writes.

At a time when conservatives are contemplating what to do after this year’s elections, fearing a massive Democratic landslide, liberals too are looking to the future, knowing that in order to keep on winning, they will have to improve themselves constantly.

And so we see both sides increasingly realizing that politics is a never-ending process, in which one has to beat ‘the other side’ year in, year out.

It seems quite possible that we will see two major machines a couple of years from now, one conservative one liberal, influencing politicians, working to get allied politicians and candidates elected, and trying to influence the future of the U.S. Meanwhile, American moderates and independent-minded voters are increasingly in the danger of being left out.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.