McCain to LAT: Release That Tape

October 30th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

Campaigning in Ohio on Wednesday, Senator John McCain continued to call on the Los AngelesTimes to release a videotape it has in its possession on which Senator Barack Obama can be seen associating, even ‘partying,’ with known enemies of the state of Israel, and supporters of Palestianians, the PLO, and even Hamas.

According to an account of the video published at the LAT, one of the attendees read a poem about Israeli terrorism on Palestinians, while Obama sat there and praised known enemy of Israel Rashid Khalidi a former spokesman for the Palestinian Liberation Organization.

However, the LAT refuses to release the tape, even though several organizations, bloggers and many thousands of readers have called on them to do so.

Earlier reports published today, also at this website, say that some believe that Obama may have made statements that would cause him tremendous problems today. The LAT denies nor confirms the accusations, but simply refuses to release the tape.

McCain, clearly getting the impression that the tape may be devastating to Obama, or at least hoping it, has now stepped up his attacks against the L.A. based newspaper, as did his running mate Sarah Palin earlier today.

“Among other things, Israel was described there as the perpetrator of terrorism rather than the victim,” Palin said at a rally in Ohio. “What we don’t know is how Barack Obama responded to these slurs on a country that he professes to support.”

Palin said the Times should win a Pulitzer Prize for “kowtowing.”

“It must be nice for a candidate to have major news organizations looking out for their best interests like that. Politicians would love to have a pet newspaper of their very own,” she said.

“If there was a tape of John McCain in a neo-Nazi outfit, I think the treatment of the issue would be slightly different,” McCain himself said in an interview with Hispanic radio stations.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.